Evaluating GPT ratings of EFL writing
A scoping review
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22420564 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yi Chen (0000-0003-1828-1165, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 68 |
| Pages | 101044 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Assessing Writing (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1075-2935 • E-ISSN: 1873-5916 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.asw.2026.101044 |
| OpenAlex | W7151093703 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 40 |
Higher education · Online assessment · Psychometric Methodologies and Testing · Second Language Acquisition and Learning · Student Assessment and Feedback
Transforming Education
Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students’ writing
Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms
Exploring the potential of using an AI language model for automated essay scoring
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research
Evaluating the role of ChatGPT in enhancing EFL writing assessments in classroom settings
Has artificial intelligence rendered language teaching obsolete
Utilizing large language models for EFL essay grading
Examining the consistency of instructor versus large language model ratings on summary content
Exploring potential biases in GPT-4o’s ratings of English language learners’ essays
A comparative study of the human, automated scoring model, and GPT-4 ratings of young EFL students’ writing
Application of an Automated Essay Scoring engine to English writing assessment using Many-Facet Rasch Measurement
Comparison of traditional machine learning and neural network approaches for automated scoring of second language English essays
Validity arguments for diagnostic assessment using automated writing evaluation
When AI meets source use
Automated Essay Scoring With GPT ‐4 for a Local Placement Test
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |