Improving Baby Room Practice
Rethinking Early Childhood Qualifications for Educators Working with 0–2-Year-Olds in England
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22420738 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mona Sakr (0000-0003-3057-2758, Middlesex University, corresponding author), Sara Bonetti (0000-0001-8856-3438, Middlesex University), Kayla Halls (0000-0002-5105-8793, Middlesex University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Early Childhood Education Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1082-3301 • E-ISSN: 1573-1707 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10643-026-02220-w |
| OpenAlex | W7160019389 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 34 |
High-quality practice with children aged 0–2 is foundational to early development, yet the qualifications that prepare early childhood educators in England pay limited attention to baby room practice. This article examines whether current qualification pathways support educators to work confidently and effectively with babies, drawing on 16 focus groups with 207 baby room educators and nursery managers. While qualifications are a key lever for improving structural and process quality, participants reported that existing training focuses primarily on older children and offers minimal grounding in babies’ development or opportunities for meaningful baby room experience. Thematic analysis identified three areas in which qualifications require substantial strengthening: a clearer focus on babies’ developmental processes, structured opportunities for high-quality practical experience in baby rooms, and greater attention to cultivating the passion, confidence, and professional identity that underpin responsive practice with the youngest children. We argue that reviewing both entry-level and higher qualifications is essential for improving 0–2 year old provision and reducing overreliance on remedial continuous professional development (CPD).
Child development · Early childhood · Early childhood education · Focus group · Professional development · Remedial education · Sociology of Education · Thematic analysis · Child Development and Digital Technology · Early Childhood Education and Development · Infant Development and Preterm Care
Is Teacher Qualification Associated With the Quality of the Early Childhood Education and Care Environment? A Meta-Analytic Review
Eecera ethical code for early childhood researchers
Australia’s Ecec workforce pipeline
Focus Groups in Social Research
Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis
Caring about care
Building a model of early years professionalism from practitioners’ perspectives
Orchestrating professional development for baby room practitioners
Who is minding the kids? New developments and lost opportunities in reforming the British early education workforce
In pursuit of quality
Problematising policies for workforce reform in early childhood education
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Pragmatism and Methodology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |