Queer[ing] Public Administration and public administration
A way forward through a contested concept
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 22420848 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Diego Galego (0000-0002-1300-7709, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, autor de correspondencia), Michelle D Evans (0000-0003-3795-0168, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga), José Luis Irizarry (0000-0002-8649-1415, North Carolina Central University) |
| Año | 2026 |
| Páginas | 1-9 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2026-07-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Administrative Theory & Praxis (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1084-1806 • E-ISSN: 1949-0461 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10841806.2026.2697111 |
| OpenAlex | W7168030616 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 34 |
This Dialogue examines the contested concept of “queer” and its implications for both Public Administration as an academic field and public administration as a practice. Acknowledging that “queer” remains internally disputed—reclaimed by some as empowerment yet experienced by others as harm—the authors deliberately adopt the term “queer[ing]” to foreground advocacy, social justice, and the ongoing process of reimagining identity and exclusion. Given the global backdrop of intensifying backlash against LGBTQIA+ rights, this Dialogue argues that progress has been uneven and that queer concerns remain vulnerable to political distortion. Rather than retreating into a scholarly “closet,” the authors call for strategic resistance built through reconceptualization, experience-based knowledge, and educational training. The Dialogue advances three interrelated pathways forward: reconceptualizing queer[ing] as an open, generative positionality rather than a fixed identity; centering queer epistemologies and lived experience within knowledge production, co-production, and policy implementation; and embedding queer[ing] within public administration education to reduce institutional bias and discrimination. Drawing on Freirean pedagogy and decolonial thought, the piece frames queer[ing] as a humanistic, transformative lens. It concludes by introducing a Special Issue intended to foster equity, amplify marginalized voices, and reimagine public administration praxis in service of democratic ideals.
Democracy · Empowerment · Politics · Praxis · Public service · Queer · Transformative learning · African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues · Critical Race Theory in Education · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Introduction to the special issue “Mobilising queer joy
Brazil's LGBTQ public policy
The loving queer gaze”
Latinx Covid-19 outcomes
Public Administrator Practice as Recognition
Actions for Queering American Public Administration
Reclaimed Homophobic Hate Speech Backfires
What makes theory queer? Why care
A statement of social justice
Intersectionality in Time
The Global Resistance to LGBTIQ Rights
Public Administration and Sports(Ball)
Social Construction of Target Populations
Queering Sport
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |