Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Communicating Darkness

Visitor Preferences for Dark Sky Interpretation

Bibliographic Data

ID22420975
AuthorsZachary A Russell (0000-0002-0242-0231, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, corresponding author), J Adam Beeco (0000-0002-4233-7061, National Park Service), Zachary D Miller (0000-0001-9909-1202, National Operations Center, Bureau of Land Management, Denver, CO, USA), Emily Wilkins (0000-0003-3055-4808, U.S. Geological Survey, Ft. Collins Science Center, CO, USA), Anna B Miller (0000-0002-4919-8156, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA), Chase C Lamborn (0000-0003-0854-6270, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA), Jordan W Smith (0000-0001-7036-4887, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA)
Year2026
Volume31
Issue1
Pages27-47
Publication date2026-04-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Interpretation Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1092-5872 • E-ISSN: 2692-9376
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/10925872261417304
OpenAlexW7130720358
LanguageEN
References cited49

Utah parks are attracting an increasing number of visitors due to the quality dark sky viewing opportunities. Despite increasing engagement in nighttime recreation, limited research exists on visitor interest in interpretation for dark skies in state and national parks. Nighttime visitors at nine Utah state and national park units certified as dark sky parks were surveyed to evaluate their preferences for dark sky-related interpretive topics and communication methods. Visitors expressed the strongest interest in astronomy and improving dark sky viewing, with ranger-led programs emerging as the most favored delivery method. National park visitors showed greater interest than state park visitors in self-guided learning formats such as interpretive displays and mobile apps for topics such as dark sky viewing/astronomy and viewing wildlife at night. These findings highlight the benefits of diverse, yet targeted communication strategies to improve visitor experiences of dark skies and foster stewardship of natural darkness in parks.

Citizen science · National park · Sky · Visitor pattern · Wildlife · Impact of Light on Environment and Health · Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management · Urban Green Space and Health

  • The new world atlas of artificial night sky brightness

    Open Access•Fabio Falchi, Pierantonio Cinzano et al.•Science Advances•2016

  • Picking up litter

    Terry Brown, Terry J Brown et al.•Journal of Sustainable Tourism•2010

  • Applying the uses and gratifications theory to identify motivational factors behind young adult's participation in viral social media challenges on TikTok

    Open Access•Grace Falgoust, Emma Winterlind et al.•Human Factors in Healthcare•2022

  • Cultural Cognition and Ideological Framing Influence Communication About Zoonotic Disease in the Era of Covid-19

    Open Access•Justin M Beall, William R Casola et al.•Frontiers in Communication•2021

  • Visitor outcomes from dark sky tourism

    Glen T Hvenegaard, Clark Banack•Journal of Ecotourism•2025

  • Night lights versus conservation dreams

    Open Access•J Adam Beeco, Sharolyn J Anderson et al.•Journal of Sustainable Tourism•2026

  • Dark Sky Parks

    Amanda Alva, Eric Brown et al.•Journal of Environmental Planning…•2025

  • A plea for a worldwide development of dark infrastructure for biodiversity – Practical examples and ways to go forward

    Open Access•Romain Sordello, Samuel Busson et al.•Landscape and Urban Planning•2022

  • Who visits U.S. national parks (and who doesn’t)? A national study of perceived constraints and vacation preferences across diverse populations

    Xiao Xiao, K J Lee et al.•Journal of Leisure Research•2022

  • The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion

    Richard E Petty, John T Cacioppo•1986

  • Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed‐Mode Surveys

    Don A Dillman, Jolene D Smyth et al.•Internet, Phone, Mail, and…•2014

  • Targeting your audience

    Zachary D Miller, Wayne Freimund et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2017

  • Participants’ Preferences for Interpretive Programs and Social Interactions at a Japanese Natural Park

    Naoko Yamada, Doug Knapp•Visitor Studies•2010

  • Uses and Gratifications

    Philip Palmgreen•Annals of the International…•1984

  • Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century

    Thomas E Ruggiero•Mass Communication & Society•2000

  • Uses and Gratifications of and Exposure to Nature 2.0 and Associated Interdependence With Nature and Pro-Environmental Behavior

    Open Access•Y L Ng•Social Science Computer Review•2020

  • Measuring Leisure Motivation

    Michael J Manfredo, B L Driver et al.•Journal of Leisure Research•1996

  • The myth of African American under-representation in nature tourism

    K J Lee•Tourism Geographies•2024

  • Grasping darkness

    Open Access•Samuel Challéat, Kévin Barré et al.•Conservation Ecology•2021

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae