Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Facial recognition on trial

Data protection, discrimination, and the ethics of algorithmic governance in policing

Bibliographic Data

ID22422101
AuthorsFrancesca Meloni (0000-0002-9121-9985, King's College London, corresponding author)
Year2026
Pages1-15
Publication date2026-03-09
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInformation & Communications Technology Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1360-0834 • E-ISSN: 1469-8404
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13600834.2026.2638629
OpenAlexW7134264586
LanguageEN

This article examines two key ethical issues surrounding the use of automated facial recognition technology in policing – data protection and discrimination. It investigates how these issues are mobilised and understood in a landmark UK case, Ed Bridges v South Wales Police. By closely analysing legal documents, I show how the court relied on policy as a performative and corrective measure to address ethical issues. I argue that this approach overlooks the broader range of social justice concerns that arise when AI technologies intersect with sociopolitical contexts and institutional practices. These include the intrusiveness of AI in everyday life, racial biases embedded in its design and application, and the institutional racism within which the technology operates. Ultimately, these juridical questions reveal deeper tensions between reformist and abolitionist perspectives.

Biometrics · Corporate governance · Facial recognition system · Information governance · COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae