The professionalisation paradox
Retaining the health advantages of community-based providers in task shifting and task sharing initiatives
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22425729 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Shukanto Das (0000-0001-5114-3923, University of Edinburgh, corresponding author), Lorna Grant (0000-0001-7248-7792, University of Edinburgh), Liz Grant (University of Edinburgh), A M Orkin (0000-0002-1111-8720, University of Toronto) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-12 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Human Resources for Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1478-4491 • E-ISSN: 1478-4491 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1186/s12960-026-01059-x |
| PMID | 41820976 |
| OpenAlex | W7135040101 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 15 |
Task shifting and task sharing involve the deliberate redistribution of healthcare responsibilities to non-specialist workers to maximise resources, expand access, and enhance health. Structured training, regulatory measures, and monitoring can transform non-specialist workers into nascent professionals. While this is often assumed to be beneficial, it can create new scarcities and resource pressures. We call this the "Professionalisation paradox": task shifting and sharing initiatives are often successful because they bring non-professional workers and approaches into healthcare delivery, but the very success of those programmes frequently prompts the professionalisation of the workers and roles involved. We explore paramedicine as a case study, where emergency responders started as part of a task shifting-based approach from military medicine to fill gaps in civilian emergency care, but have now become a professional group bound by rules that can restrict their flexibility. Professionalisation offers advantages such as improving care standards, safety, and worker employment security. However, this also means that paramedics are less able to act freely and compassionately, as they might feel limited by regulations or fearful of making mistakes. We propose ways to balance the benefits of professionalisation while keeping task shifting and task sharing adaptable and community-focused. Future approaches to creating task shifting and task sharing-based models of service delivery might include combining structured training with more flexible methods. This will allow providers to use their skills without feeling overly restricted. Creating supportive policy frameworks around these roles could help maintain accountability and give them more room to respond to patient needs. Striking this balance will help ensure that task shifting and task sharing retain their core purpose of providing accessible, responsive care.
Accountability · Feeling · Health administration · Health care · Health services research · Service provider · Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation · Emergency and Acute Care Studies · Global Health Workforce Issues
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |