Universal Design for Learning in Public Affairs Education
Implementing Inclusive Pedagogical Practices for Students with Disabilities
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22425959 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Xu Wang (0000-0002-7634-6716, Inner Mongolia Normal University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 236-261 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Public Affairs Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1523-6803 • E-ISSN: 2328-9643 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/15236803261430171 |
| OpenAlex | W7140595486 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 31 |
This study examines the alignment between Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles and current pedagogical practices in Master of Public Administration and Master of Public Policy programs. Using a convergent parallel mixed-methods design, the research analyzed 40 NASPAA-accredited programs through environmental scanning, conducted interviews with 18 faculty members, and surveyed 127 graduate students. Findings reveal that while all programs include disability accommodation statements, fewer than 12% of syllabi demonstrate proactive UDL implementation. Students with disabilities reported significant obstacles including disclosure concerns, inflexible assessment structures, and technology access challenges. Faculty identified knowledge gaps and resource constraints as primary obstacles to inclusive pedagogy. The study documents promising UDL practices such as multiple assignment formats, flexible deadlines, and authentic assessments that maintain professional standards while enhancing inclusive access. Recommendations emphasize systematic faculty development, institutional resource allocation, and strengthened NASPAA accreditation standards. The study employs Universal Design for Learning as an analytical framework for interpreting findings rather than evaluating UDL implementation. The research contributes the first comprehensive examination of disability-inclusive teaching practices in public affairs education.
Accreditation · Best practice · Higher education · Syllabus · Universal design · Universal Design for Learning · Disability Education and Employment · Disability Rights and Representation · Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Academic Ableism
A Review of Research on Universal Design Educational Models
Achieving Integration in Mixed Methods Designs—Principles and Practices
Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research
Social Equity Is a Pillar of Public Administration
Curriculum design and professional alignment in public policy graduate programs
Higher education and disability
Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research
Documenting Hidden Disabilities in Higher Education
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Best Practice Recommendations for Replicating Experiments in Public Administration
Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit)
Developing and Implementing a Triangulation Protocol for Qualitative Health Research
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |