Stakeholders’ perceptions of factors shaping quality of life in rural areas
Evidence from two Italian case studies
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 22426972 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Maria Andreoli (0000-0002-7511-8279, University of Basilicata), Francesca Gerini (0000-0003-4103-1359, University of Florence), Mario Cozzi (0000-0002-7210-9967, University of Basilicata), Severino Romano (0000-0003-2122-8154, University of Basilicata), Fabio Boncinelli (0000-0003-2049-6720, University of Florence), Leonardo Casini (0000-0001-8965-4390, University of Florence), Enrico Marone (0000-0002-1228-2733, University of Florence), Martijn Burger (0000-0002-9529-849X, Erasmus University Rotterdam), Mauro Viccaro (0000-0001-9315-4110, University of Basilicata) |
| Año | 2026 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2026-01-22 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Aestimum (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1592-6117 • E-ISSN: 1724-2118 |
| Editorial | Firenze University Press (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.36253/aestim-18753 |
| OpenAlex | W7125564703 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 66 |
Rural areas play a crucial role in achieving sustainable development, yet they face persistent and recurring social issues such as demographic decline, limited access to essential services, and economic stagnation. Framed on community revitalization and place-based development, this study examines the factors influencing quality of life in marginal rural areas at high risk of abandonment, focusing on Basilicata and Tuscany—two Italian regions with distinct socio-economic profiles. Adopting a qualitative approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with local stakeholders to capture their lived experiences and perceptions of rural well-being and development opportunities. The analysis, supported by textual data processing, highlights shared and region-specific challenges. Key themes include service accessibility, demographic dynamics, economic opportunities, and governance capacity. Findings reveal that while both regions emphasize essential services and economic revitalization, their approaches differ: Basilicata stakeholders stress infrastructural deficits and demographic decline, whereas Tuscany stakeholders highlight rural diversification and place-based initiatives. These insights underscore the importance of local stakeholder perceptions in shaping rural development strategies. The study contributes to theoretical debates on rural well-being by demonstrating how stakeholder perspectives influence policy priorities and intervention strategies. It advocates for place-sensitive policies that enhance institutional capacity and leverage regional assets to promote sustainable rural community revitalization. These findings support the need for a context-specific approach to rural policy that integrates both qualitative and quantitative measures of well-being.
Corporate governance · General partnership · Perception · Qualitative research · Rural area · Stakeholder · Sustainability · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Regional resilience and development · Rural development and sustainability
Sex & Social Justice
How's Life? 2020
Qualitative Research
How to use and assess qualitative research methods
Measuring objective and subjective well-being
The Living Standard
The impact of the physical and urban environment on mental well-being
Iramuteq
What Can Economists Learn from Happiness Research?
An institutional periphery in discussion. Rethinking the inner areas in Italy
Urban – Rural dwellers’ well-being determinants
Semantic Network Analysis in Social Sciences
Supply chain responsibility in agriculture and its integration with rural community development
Viewpoint
Measuring Progress and Well-Being
Get Your Head into the Clouds
The cultural and creative economy in Italy
Peripheries within economic geography
Social inequalities in rural England
Differentiating countryside
Exploring dairy farmers’ quality of life perceptions – A Swiss case study
Rural innovation system
Evaluating rural viability and well-being
Translating local stakeholders' perception in rural development strategies under uncertainty conditions
Platform Spaces
Bridging regional gaps
The conservation of cultural heritage in rural areas
Rural planning? An integrated dynamic model for assessing quality of life at a local scale
What we talk about when we talk about shrinking cities
What makes a ‘happy city’
Rurality and Social Inclusion
Redefining the ‘Rural Question’
Local Migration Governance in European Shrinking Areas
Developing a Model of Community Wellbeing and Resilience in Response to Change
A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data
Women and Human Development
Why some rural areas decline while some others not
Rural Marginalisation and the Role of Social Innovation; A Turn Towards Nexogenous Development and Rural Reconnection
Exploring the Rural Eco-Economy
Mobilities, Vulnerabilities and Sustainabilities
Developments in the Measurement of Subjective Well-Being
Grounded Theory
What Is Rural Well-Being and How Is It Measured? An Attempt to Order Chaos
Objective and Subjective Quality of Life
A Multicriteria Approach for Well-Being Assessment in Rural Areas
A Comparison of the Well-Being of Agricultural and Non Agricultural Households Using a Multicriterial Approach
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |