Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Captioning of non-speech information in children’s programming on Pbskids.Org

Bibliographic Data

ID22427063
AuthorsPhillip Coxwell (0009-0004-6705-9290, Auburn University), Norman E Youngblood (0000-0002-6662-3994, Auburn University, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume25
Issue2
Publication date2026-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueUniversal Access in the Information Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1615-5289 • E-ISSN: 1615-5297
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10209-026-01321-y
OpenAlexW7154508982
LanguageEN
References cited30

This study examines how captioners for current children’s shows from PBS Kids in the United States caption non-speech information (NSI). While NSI captioning is a critical component in making soundscapes accessible for the Deaf or hard of hearing, the area is understudied. We asked four research questions to better understand how NSI is used children’s programming. RQ1 questions the prevalence of NSI captions. RQ2 asks if the NSI captions follow best practices. RQ3 queries whether NSI captions are consistent within each episode. RQ4 questions whether non-standard NSI captioning techniques were used. We downloaded the episode caption files from the most recent episode of 12 programs from the online PBS Kids website and exported them into a spreadsheet for coding. We developed our coding strategy using the Described and Captioned Media Program’s Captioning Key . We coded captions by comparing the captions to the video content, including background sounds, music, and dialogue. We found Speaker ID the most used NSI and silence rarely if ever captioned. Drawing on the Described and Captioned Media Program’s Captioning Key for best practices, we found varying levels of compliance, but that NSI captions were consistent within a show. None of the shows used experimental captioning practices. The variations in NSI captioning argue for standardized captioning practices, and our findings may help create a benchmark for future studies.

Closed captioning · Silence · Hearing Impairment and Communication · Subtitles and Audiovisual Media · Translation Studies and Practices

  • Issues and Best Practices in Content Analysis

    Open Access•Stephen Lacy, Brendan R Watson et al.•Journalism & Mass Communication…•2015

  • Extensive viewing of children’s entertainment and the potential for incidental learning of early years reading vocabulary

    Clarence Green•Language and Education•2023

  • Moral clarity decreases as viewer age increases

    Lindsay Hahn•Journal of Children and Media•2022

  • Television Literacy

    Margaret S Jelinek Lewis•The Journal of Deaf Studies and…•2001

  • Education runs quickly violence runs slowly

    Open Access•Edward J Schneider, Edward Schneider•First Monday•2024

  • Reading Achievement of Deaf Students

    Open Access•Connie Mayer, Beverly J Trezek et al.•The Journal of Deaf Studies and…•2021

  • Those funny subtitles’

    Katherine Frances Nagels•Early Popular Visual Culture•2012

  • Watching accessible cartoons

    Nazaret Fresno•Perspectives•2017

  • Of bad hombres and nasty women; the quality of the live closed captioning in the 2016 US final presidential debate

    Nazaret Fresno•Perspectives•2018

  • Uses and Gratifications Research

    Elihu Katz, Jay G Blumler et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1973

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae