Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Emerging technologies and sustainable governance

Exploring efficiency and institutional inertia in China’s public sector ecosystem

Bibliographic Data

ID22428309
AuthorsSuleman Bawa (0009-0007-4520-3492, Xi’an University, corresponding author)
Year2026
Pages1-32
Publication date2026-04-28
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueTransforming Government: People, Process and Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1750-6166 • E-ISSN: 1750-6166
PublisherEmerald (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1108/tg-10-2025-0337
OpenAlexW7155557456
LanguageEN
References cited51

Purpose This study aims to examine how emerging technologies shape the cost-efficiency and sustainability performance of public governance institutions. It explores the influence of digital transformation, technological complexity and bureaucratic inertia on environmental policy outcomes, accounting for departmental heterogeneity and interorganizational coordination. Design/methodology/approach Grounded in an adaptation of production network theory and public management literature, a multilevel framework conceptualizes government departments as interdependent production units. Using a panel dataset from 31 Chinese provinces (2010–2023), the study employs fixed-effects regression, spatial network models (to proxy for interdepartmental spillovers) and stochastic frontier analysis. Key constructs include a novel Digital Transformation Index, a Sustainable Governance Performance Score and a newly operationalized latent measure of bureaucratic inertia derived from administrative process indicators. Findings Digital transformation significantly enhances sustainable governance performance, particularly in technologically complex departments, while bureaucratic inertia constrains efficiency. Nonlinear effects reveal diminishing returns, and spatial analysis confirms province-level spillovers that amplify systemic sustainability gains. Originality/value This study advances public management theory by systematically adapting production network logic to the public sector and by quantifying bureaucratic inertia using a novel, empirically grounded latent construct. It offers evidence-based insights for optimizing institutional efficiency and accelerating progress toward sustainable development goals through coordinated digital transformation, while acknowledging limitations in measuring direct interdepartmental flows.

Bureaucracy · Corporate governance · Environmental governance · Network governance · Operationalization · Public sector · Sustainability · Sustainable development · Efficiency Analysis Using DEA · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance

  • The effect of urbanization on environmental pollution in rapidly developing urban agglomerations

    Open Access•Longwu Liang, Zhenbo Wang et al.•Journal of Cleaner Production•2019

  • Political turnover and economic performance

    Open Access•Hongbin Li, Li-An Zhou et al.•Journal of Public Economics•2005

  • A review on circular economy

    Open Access•Patrizia Ghisellini, Catia Cialani et al.•Journal of Cleaner Production•2016

  • Digital Transformation in SMEs Emerging Technological Tools and Technologies for Enhancing the SME's Strategies and Outcomes

    Open Access•Mohammad Rakibul Islam Bhuiyan, Mahfujur Rahman Faraji et al.•Journal of Ecohumanism•2024

  • Enabling technologies and sustainable smart cities

    Open Access•Mohd Abdul Ahad, Sara Paiva et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2020

  • AI for the public. How public interest theory shifts the discourse on AI

    Open Access•Theresa Züger, Hadi Asghari•AI & Society•2023

  • A comparison of smart city research and practice in Sweden and Japan

    Open Access•Natsumi Sakuma, G Trencher et al.•Sustainability Science•2021

  • Spatial differentiation and driving factors of the high-quality development of undertakings for the aged of China

    Open Access•Rong Peng, Jianhang Huang et al.•International Journal for Equity…•2023

  • Measuring Policy Performance, Democracy, and Governance Capacities

    Open Access•Aurel Croissant, Lars Pelke•European Policy Analysis•2022

  • Universal and contextualized public services

    Open Access•John Carlo Bertot, John Bertot et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2016

  • Being smart

    Open Access•Jose Ramon Gil-Garcia, Natalie Helbig et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2014

  • Urbanization in developing countries

    Open Access•Barney Cohen•Technology in Society•2006

  • The digital governance puzzle

    Open Access•Eran Vigoda‐gadot, Shlomo Mizrahi•Technology in Society•2024

  • Digital transformation and its effect on resource allocation efficiency and productivity in Chinese corporations

    Open Access•Weijie Jiang, Jiaye Li•Technology in Society•2024

  • Growth, population and industrialization, and urban land expansion of China

    Open Access•Xiangzheng Deng, Jikun Huang et al.•Journal of Urban Economics•2008

  • Market Orientation and Public Service Performance

    Open Access•Richard M Walker, Gene A Brewer et al.•Public Administration Review•2011

  • Leading for public value in multi-agency collaboration

    Open Access•Steven Parker, Jean Hartley et al.•Public Policy and Administration•2023

  • New Public Management Is Dead--Long Live Digital-Era Governance

    Patrick Dunleavy•Journal of Public Administration…•2005

  • Toward a Dynamic Theory of Global Production Networks

    Open Access•Henry Wai-Chung Yeung, Henry Wai‐chung Yeung et al.•Economic Geography•2015

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae