Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Abstract Cognition Across Cultures

Bibliographic Data

ID22428587
AuthorsArun Kumar Singh (0000-0002-8400-9605, Cornell University, corresponding author), Amritpal Singh (0000-0002-9313-0167, Department of Psychology Cornell University), Jiangxue Ning (Cornell University), Shikun Su (Cornell University), Daniel Casasanto (0000-0002-2021-1580, Cornell University)
Year2026
Pagese70061-e70061
Publication date2026-05-27
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTopics in Cognitive Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1756-8757 • E-ISSN: 1756-8765
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/tops.70061
PMID42200806
OpenAlexW7162507942
LanguageEN
References cited58

How do minds differ across cultures? According to one long‐standing perspective in the social sciences, people from Chinese cultures think less abstractly than people from Western cultures. Here, we argue that previous studies of attention, perception, and memory suggest that East Asians may think more abstractly than Westerners due to their greater sensitivity to social and physical contexts. We tested these competing hypotheses in studies focused on two operationalizations of abstract thought: event construal and analogical reasoning. In the first three studies ( N = 1797), participants chose whether events were best described abstractly or concretely. Across six independent national samples, Chinese participants were more likely than U.S. participants to construe events abstractly. In the next study ( n = 965), participants from a more context‐sensitive Chinese subculture were more likely to construe events abstractly than those from a less context‐sensitive subculture. In the final two studies, participants attempted to solve analogical reasoning problems. Across four independent national samples ( N = 677), Chinese participants were more likely than U.S. participants to solve the analogical reasoning problems correctly. Together, these results challenge the claim that Westerners think more abstractly than Chinese people and suggest that context‐sensitivity may be an engine of abstract cognition.

Chinese culture · Cognition · Cognitive style · Construal level theory · Cultural diversity · Social cognition · Social cognitive theory · Categorization, perception, and language · Child and Animal Learning Development · Cultural Differences and Values

  • Phonological awareness and visual skills in learning to read Chinese and English

    Open Access•Hui-Wen Huang, H S Huang et al.•Cognition•1995

  • Culture and point of view

    Open Access•Richard E Nisbett, Takahiko Masuda•Proceedings of the National…•2003

  • Forest before trees

    Open Access•David Navon•Cognitive Psychology•1977

  • There Are Many Ways to See the Forest for the Trees

    Open Access•Erin M Burgoon, Marlone D Henderson et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2013

  • Ecocultural basis of cognition

    Open Access•Ayse K Uskul, Shinobu Kitayama et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2008

  • Large-Scale Psychological Differences Within China Explained by Rice Versus Wheat Agriculture

    Open Access•Thomas Talhelm, Xianfei Zhang et al.•Science•2014

  • Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.

    Allan Paivio, John C Yuille et al.•Journal of Experimental…•1968

  • Culture and Change Blindness

    Open Access•Takahiko Masuda, Richard E Nisbett•Cognitive Science•2006

  • The Raven's Progressive Matrices

    Open Access•John Raven•Cognitive Psychology•2000

  • Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception

    Open Access•Hannah Faye Chua, Julie E Boland et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2005

  • Personality and intelligence as predictors of academic achievement

    Open Access•Kaia Laidra, Helle Pullmann et al.•Personality and Individual…•2007

  • What one intelligence test measures

    Patricia A Carpenter, Marcel Adam Just et al.•Psychological Review•1990

  • Construal-level theory of psychological distance.

    Yaacov Trope, Nira Liberman•Psychological Review•2010

  • Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing

    Open Access•Dale J Barr, Roger Levy et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2013

  • Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

    Open Access•David M Bates, Douglas Bates et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2015

  • Culture and systems of thought

    Richard E Nisbett, Kaiping Peng et al.•Psychological Review•2001

  • Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items

    Open Access•R Harald Baayen, D J Davidson et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2008

  • What we mean when we say semantic

    Open Access•Jamie Reilly, Cory Shain et al.•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2025

  • Teens in Rice County Are More Interdependent and Think More Holistically Than Nearby Wheat County

    Open Access•Xiawei Dong, Thomas Talhelm et al.•Social Psychological and…•2019

  • What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior

    Robin R Vallacher, Daniel M Wegner•Psychological Review•1987

  • Chinese and Australian Concepts of Intelligence

    Open Access•May Jane Chen•Psychology and Developing Societies•1994

  • Intelligence in China

    Open Access•Richard Lynn•Social Behavior and Personality…•1991

  • Cultural Differences in Cognition

    Open Access•Helen Altman Klein, Mei‐Hua Lin et al.•Psychological Reports•2009

  • The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others' self-regulatory efforts

    Open Access•Antonio L Freitas, Peter M Gollwitzer et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2004

  • Weird–Confucian comparisons

    Kuba Krys, Igor De Almeida et al.•American Psychologist•2024

  • Levels of personal agency

    Robin R Vallacher, Daniel M Wegner•Journal of Personality and Social…•1989

  • Culture and the self

    Hazel Rose Markus, Shinobu Kitayama•Psychological Review•1991

  • Attending holistically versus analytically

    Takahiko Masuda, Richard E Nisbett•Journal of Personality and Social…•2001

  • Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment

    L J Ji, Li-Jun Ji et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2000

  • Independence and conformity in subsistence-level societies

    J Berry, J W Berry•Journal of Personality and Social…•1967

  • Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning

    Open Access•Ara Norenzayan, Edward E Smith et al.•Cognitive Science•2002

  • Culture and Aesthetic Preference

    Open Access•T Masuda, Richard Gonzalez et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2008

  • Is It Culture or Is It Language? Examination of Language Effects in Cross-Cultural Research on Categorization

    L J Ji, Zhiyong Zhang et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2004

  • Cultural Influences on Categorization Processes

    Open Access•Sara J Unsworth, Christopher R Sears et al.•Journal of Cross-Cultural…•2005

  • Feeling Mixed but Not Torn

    Jiewen Hong, Angela Yuson Lee•Journal of Consumer Research•2010

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae