Abstract Cognition Across Cultures
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22428587 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Arun Kumar Singh (0000-0002-8400-9605, Cornell University, corresponding author), Amritpal Singh (0000-0002-9313-0167, Department of Psychology Cornell University), Jiangxue Ning (Cornell University), Shikun Su (Cornell University), Daniel Casasanto (0000-0002-2021-1580, Cornell University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | e70061-e70061 |
| Publication date | 2026-05-27 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Topics in Cognitive Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1756-8757 • E-ISSN: 1756-8765 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/tops.70061 |
| PMID | 42200806 |
| OpenAlex | W7162507942 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 58 |
How do minds differ across cultures? According to one long‐standing perspective in the social sciences, people from Chinese cultures think less abstractly than people from Western cultures. Here, we argue that previous studies of attention, perception, and memory suggest that East Asians may think more abstractly than Westerners due to their greater sensitivity to social and physical contexts. We tested these competing hypotheses in studies focused on two operationalizations of abstract thought: event construal and analogical reasoning. In the first three studies ( N = 1797), participants chose whether events were best described abstractly or concretely. Across six independent national samples, Chinese participants were more likely than U.S. participants to construe events abstractly. In the next study ( n = 965), participants from a more context‐sensitive Chinese subculture were more likely to construe events abstractly than those from a less context‐sensitive subculture. In the final two studies, participants attempted to solve analogical reasoning problems. Across four independent national samples ( N = 677), Chinese participants were more likely than U.S. participants to solve the analogical reasoning problems correctly. Together, these results challenge the claim that Westerners think more abstractly than Chinese people and suggest that context‐sensitivity may be an engine of abstract cognition.
Chinese culture · Cognition · Cognitive style · Construal level theory · Cultural diversity · Social cognition · Social cognitive theory · Categorization, perception, and language · Child and Animal Learning Development · Cultural Differences and Values
Phonological awareness and visual skills in learning to read Chinese and English
Culture and point of view
Forest before trees
There Are Many Ways to See the Forest for the Trees
Ecocultural basis of cognition
Large-Scale Psychological Differences Within China Explained by Rice Versus Wheat Agriculture
Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.
Culture and Change Blindness
The Raven's Progressive Matrices
Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception
Personality and intelligence as predictors of academic achievement
What one intelligence test measures
Construal-level theory of psychological distance.
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
Culture and systems of thought
Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items
What we mean when we say semantic
Teens in Rice County Are More Interdependent and Think More Holistically Than Nearby Wheat County
What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior
Chinese and Australian Concepts of Intelligence
Intelligence in China
Cultural Differences in Cognition
The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others' self-regulatory efforts
Weird–Confucian comparisons
Levels of personal agency
Culture and the self
Attending holistically versus analytically
Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment
Independence and conformity in subsistence-level societies
Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning
Culture and Aesthetic Preference
Is It Culture or Is It Language? Examination of Language Effects in Cross-Cultural Research on Categorization
Cultural Influences on Categorization Processes
Feeling Mixed but Not Torn
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |