Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Assessment of data quality and validity of composite innovation indicators with a neutrosophic multi-criteria approach

Bibliographic Data

ID22430768
AuthorsJavier Reig-Mullor (0000-0002-1595-0581, Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx), Ana Garcia-Bernabeu (0000-0003-3181-7745, Universitat Politècnica de València), Francisco Salas‐Molina (0000-0002-1168-7931, Universitat Politècnica de València), David Pla-Santamaria (0000-0003-1563-3997, Universitat Politècnica de València)
Year2026
Volume32
Issue1
Pages315-335
Publication date2026-02-24
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTechnological and Economic Development of Economy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2029-4913 • E-ISSN: 2029-4921
PublisherVilnius Gediminas Technical University (PUBLISHER • LT)
DOI10.3846/tede.2026.25283
OpenAlexW7131245773
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited43

In light of the emphasis on innovation as a driver of economic growth, new tools are needed to measure and compare national innovation systems. Improving methodological approaches to constructing composite innovation indicators also requires exploring issues related to aggregation, weighting, and reviewing the quality and validity of the data. This paper aims to support this debate by assessing the process and outcomes of innovation using fuzzy theory combined with a multicriteria technique to address the uncertainty attached to the underlying data used in constructing the composite indicator. Mainly, we deal with the problems related to the uniformity of the period covered by the indicator and the origin and reliability of the source of information by incorporating degrees of truth, indeterminacy, and falsity into the assessment process by applying neutrosophic numbers. To test the effectiveness of our approach, an empirical analysis is carried out based on the European Innovation Scoreboard and the assessment of the elementary criteria over the period 2020–2023.

Composite indicator · Falsity · Fuzzy logic · History and advancements in chemistry · Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Quality of Life Measurement

  • Enhancing transparency in circular economy assessment

    Open Access•Javier Reig-Mullor, Ana Garcia-Bernabeu et al.•Sustainable Futures•2026

  • Multiple Attribute Decision Making

    Open Access•Ching-Lai Hwang, Kwangsun Yoon•Multiple Attribute Decision Making•1981

  • Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making

    Ching-Lai Hwang, Kwangsun Yoon•Multiple Attribute Decision Making•1981

  • Intuitionistic fuzzy sets

    Open Access•Krassimir T Atanassov, Krassimir Atanassov•Fuzzy Sets and Systems•1986

  • Noncompensatory/nonlinear composite indicators for ranking countries

    Giuseppe Munda, Michela Nardo•Applied Economics•2009

  • Fuzzy sets

    Open Access•L A Zadeh•Information and Control•1965

  • On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices

    Open Access•Salvatore Greco, Alessio Ishizaka et al.•Social Indicators Research•2019

  • A Reference Point-Based Proposal to Build Regional Quality of Life Composite Indicators

    Open Access•Ana Garcia-Bernabeu, José Manuel Cabello et al.•Social Indicators Research•2022

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae