Generative AI as an External Cognitive Tool for Developing Creative Intelligence in Visual Design
A Mixed-Methods Randomized Study Using Cognitive Load Indicators and Motivational Modeling
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22431395 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ziyang Huang (0000-0001-6422-225X, Hanyang University), Jiajia Zhao (0000-0002-7962-1912, Hanyang University), Xuan Fu (0009-0009-1125-2805, Hanyang University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 65 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-14 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Intelligence (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2079-3200 • E-ISSN: 2079-3200 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/jintelligence14040065 |
| PMID | 42042245 |
| OpenAlex | W7154227336 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 50 |
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly transforming design education by enabling new forms of human–AI collaborative learning. However, how GenAI relates to cognitive and motivational processes in design learning contexts remains insufficiently understood. This study examines whether integrating GenAI into visual design instruction is associated with improvements in domain-specific creative performance and explores the relationships among cognitive load, learning motivation, and learning outcomes. A six-week randomized instructional experiment was conducted with 120 undergraduate students majoring in visual communication design. Creative performance was evaluated through blind expert ratings, and the relationships among key variables were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results show that GenAI-integrated instruction is associated with higher levels of learning motivation, engagement, and expert-rated creative performance compared with traditional instruction, whereas cognitive-load indicators show comparatively limited predictive strength within the overall model. In addition, Integrated Teaching Alignment (ITA) significantly moderates the relationship between perceived relevance and learning satisfaction. These findings suggest that GenAI may function as an external cognitive support tool, with learning outcomes appearing to be associated with motivational and instructional factors, while cognitive-load indicators show comparatively limited associations within this instructional context.
Cognition · Cognitive Load · Generative model · Instructional design · Structural equation modeling · Creativity in Education and Neuroscience · Design Education and Practice · Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Cognitive Load Theory
Motivational Design for Learning and Performance
Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R
Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom
Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design
A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education from 2010 to 2020
A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology
Cognitive Load During Problem Solving
Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research
The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education
Analyzing Relationships Between Causal and Assessment Factors of Cognitive Load
Learning by playing with generative AI
Enhancing motivation and academic performance through gamified digital game-based learning methodology using the ARCS model
Is the impact of artificial intelligence generation tools on improving art education positive or negative? Perspectives of professors and students
Evaluating the effectiveness of blended learning using the ARCS model
Learning Achievement in Virtual Reality/Animation‐Based Business Simulation Games
The promise and challenges of generative AI in education
Thanks Coefficient Alpha, We Still Need You
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |