Research on the Impact of Environmental Protection Tax on Enterprises’ Green Innovation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22431923 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Songqin Ye (0000-0002-3997-1299, Guangzhou Maritime College), Anpeng Tu (Jiangxi Normal University), Fengping Liu (0000-0003-4346-5724, Nanchang Jiaotong Institute, China), Ping Hu (0009-0008-2583-3339, Jiangxi College of Applied Technology, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | SAGE Open (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2158-2440 • E-ISSN: 2158-2440 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/21582440261467959 |
| OpenAlex | W7168158220 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 48 |
Green innovation serves as a pivotal force driving high-quality economic development and facilitating the achievement of environmental objectives. As a crucial instrument for regulating firms’ environmental practices, the environmental protection tax exerts a central role in fostering green innovation. Using Chinese A-share listed companies from 2011 to 2019 as the research sample, this study employs DID model to empirically examine the impact and underlying mechanisms of the environmental protection tax policy on firms’ green innovation. The results indicate that the environmental protection tax effectively promotes firms’ green innovation activities through the dual mechanisms of innovation compensation and environmental legitimacy pressure. Specifically, executive pay stickiness exerts a positive moderating effect, and the incentive effect of the environmental protection tax is more pronounced in firms with higher pay stickiness. Further analysis reveals that the promotional effect is significantly stronger in key pollution-monitored enterprises and SOEs compared to other types of firms. This study sheds light on the roles of executive pay stickiness, environmental regulation intensity, and nature of property rights as key boundary conditions. It also broadens the understanding of the microeconomic consequences of environmental tax policies, thereby establishing a reference-worthy framework for emerging economies in terms of legalization, differentiation, and local attribution of revenue in environmental tax system reform.
Emerging markets · Environmental regulation · Environmental tax · Incentive · Legitimacy · Porter hypothesis · Revenue · Tax revenue · Corporate Taxation and Avoidance · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth · Environmental Sustainability in Business
Environmental regulation and competitiveness
Green technology innovation and financial development
On the relationship between environmental management, environmental innovation and patenting
Green Innovation Strategy and Green Innovation
Pretest with Caution
The effects of three types of environmental regulation on eco-efficiency
Environmental Regulation, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure and Enterprise Green Innovation
Green Investment and Coordination Failure
Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
How environmental regulations affect corporate innovation? The coupling mechanism of mandatory rules and voluntary management
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |