Evaluation of the slow city through the integration of qualitative methods and the Dematel technique

Bibliographic Data

ID22432986
AuthorsOnur Akcakaya (0000-0002-7328-5380, Ardahan University, corresponding author), İhsan Kurtbaş (0000-0002-5828-6887, Ardahan University), Ezgi Dilan Urmak Akcakaya (0000-0003-3472-1837, Ardahan University)
Year2026
Volume15
Issue3
Pages1379-1394
Publication date2026-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Urban Management (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2226-5856 • E-ISSN: 2589-0360
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.jum.2026.02.006
OpenAlexW7134133718
LanguageEN
References cited35

The aim of this study is to examine the Slow City Movement within a multidimensional framework, revealing its conceptual, theoretical, and dimensional revisions. A two-stage methodology was used in the study. In the first stage, data collected from 10 field experts were analyzed using the Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) technique. In this stage, the dimensions included in the Citta Slow International Charter were evaluated, weighted, and their effects on each other were determined. In the second stage, qualitative method was used to seek answers to the fundamental theoretical debates of the Slow City. Common areas of discussion related to Slow Cities, such as efficiency, new dimensions, technology relations, and metropolitan applications, were analyzed in light of data collected from a total of 17 field experts. Furthermore, the 73 criteria in the Citta Slow International Charter were thematically categorized, and solutions were proposed for the complex structure of the framework. According to the DEMATEL findings, the most important dimension is “Urban Quality,” while the least important dimension is “Partnership.” It was determined that the dimensions influence each other at various levels. According to the qualitative findings, ‘preventing social acceleration’ is proposed as an independent dimension. On the other hand, technology should not accelerate or transform the slow city while solving urban problems. Here, the concept of “degenerative speed” is defined and advanced for slow cities. • The most important dimension is 'Urban Quality" while the least important dimension is 'Partnership'. All dimensions have an effect on each other. • While technology is necessary, it is limited by the concept of the 'degenerative speed'. • Preventing social acceleration is an important and recommended component of the Slow City Movement. • The Slow City criteria have been made thematic and systematic.

Qualitative analysis · Qualitative research · Regional Development and Management Studies · Sustainable Urban and Rural Development · Urbanization and City Planning

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access