Anger arouses, persuasion unites
An experimental test of the anger-cohesion distinction in Nigerian partisan political communication
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22433602 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ada Peter (Covenant University), Rejoice Gberevbie (Covenant University), Favour Egbogun (Covenant University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-10 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Communication (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2297-900X • E-ISSN: 2297-900X |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fcomm.2026.1870038 |
| OpenAlex | W7167923277 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 17 |
This study reports a between-subjects experiment testing the Reciprocity of Outrage Theory (ROT), which proposes that political messages designed to provoke anger toward an opposing group generate stronger in-group loyalty, pride, and mobilisation than aspirational messages affirming in-group values. Two hundred self-identified supporters of the People's Democratic Party (PDP), Nigeria's principal opposition party, were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: an outrage message attacking the All Progressives Congress (APC), Nigeria's ruling party, or an aspirational persuasion message affirming PDP values. Participants were subsequently measured on six emotional and behavioural outcome variables using five-point Likert scales and binary intention items. The primary finding is a systematic anger-cohesion dissociation: the outrage message generated substantially higher anger (M = 4.15 vs. 1.73, d = 2.34) and willingness to argue (68% vs. 58%), while the persuasion message generated higher pride (M = 4.32 vs. 1.29, d = −3.86), defence motivation (M = 4.28 vs. 1.23, d = −4.02), and group loyalty (93% vs. 0%). This dissociation demonstrates empirically that anger and cohesion are separate mobilisation outcomes with direct consequences for campaign strategy and platform governance. Limitations and four predictions for future research are discussed.
Anger · Disinformation · Hypocrisy · Loyalty · Outrage · Persuasion · Politics · Pride · Communication in Education and Healthcare · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Media and Politics
The Rationalizing Voter
Republic
A Virtuous Circle
Experimental Foundations of Political Science
Post-Broadcast Democracy
Frenemies
Uncivil Agreement
The Partisan Brain
Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization
Variability in Citizens’ Reactions to Different Types of Negative Campaigns
Election Night’s Alright for Fighting
Social Media Disruption
The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States
Expressive Partisanship
| Highly cited | No |
|---|