Seeing isn't always believing
The effects of misinformation modality and debunking on message credibility and memory recall
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22434230 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Timothy Prestby (0000-0002-4652-7735, Pennsylvania State University, corresponding author), Eunchae Jang (0000-0001-7547-9050, Pennsylvania State University), Andrew Pacheco (PepsiCo), A Andrew Pacheco (0000-0002-2065-5624, PepsiCo (United Kingdom)) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-22 |
| Publication date | 2026-05-14 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Cartography (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2372-9333 • E-ISSN: 2372-9341 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/23729333.2026.2655716 |
| OpenAlex | W7161161428 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 61 |
The proliferation of realistic-looking visuals such as maps and images that are deliberately fabricated to spread misinformation has ignited a public trust crisis. Does the visual nature of this misinformation make it more credible and memorable? Does debunking affect people’s credibility judgments and memory of misinformation? This study explores these questions by conducting an online pre-post test experiment (N = 317). Accordingly, we compare responses to one misinformation article story in three different formats: text-only, text and ground-image, and text and satellite map while investigating if the inclusion of a follow-up debunking article changes these responses. Our findings suggest that visual modalities did not lead to higher recall or message credibility compared to text modality. However, debunking was effective in decreasing message credibility regardless of the modality of misinformation and in bolstering recall of misinformation and correcting information. Beyond expanding our theoretical understanding of modality effects by studying maps, our findings provide guidance on how to effectively debunk misinformation with fact-checking.
Credibility · Misinformation · Modality effect · Perception · Recall · Media Influence and Health · Memory Processes and Influences · Misinformation and Its Impacts
Memory
Debunking
Being There in the Midst of the Story
Stimulus Sampling and Social Psychological Experimentation
Metacognitive Experiences and the Intricacies of Setting People Straight
The Emergence of Deepfake Technology
How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews
Something that They Never Said
Deepfake false memories
The effect of message modality on memory for political disinformation
The Development and Influence of Parasocial Relationships With Television Characters
Emotions, Partisanship, and Misperceptions
Measuring Message Credibility
Conceptualizing sources in online news
When I Learn the News is False
Countering Misinformation and Fake News Through Inoculation and Prebunking
Systematic Literature Review on the Spread of Health-related Misinformation on Social Media
Credibility for the 21st Century
Applying Research on the Uses and Cognitive Effects of Hypermedia to the Study of the World Wide Web
Use of Social Media Platforms among Adults in the United States—Behavior on Social Media
Deep fake geography? When geospatial data encounter Artificial Intelligence
Elements of viral cartography
Effects of Journalistic Adjudication on Factual Beliefs, News Evaluations, Information Seeking, and Epistemic Political Efficacy
Seeing Is Believing
AI-Mediated Communication
The vividness effect
From the Best Authorities’
The ‘view from nowhere’? Spatial politics and cultural significance of high-resolution satellite imagery
From God's-eye to Camera-eye
Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion
Source monitoring
Crowdsourced Cartography
Mapping in an Echo Chamber
Heuristic Versus Systematic Processing of Specialist Versus Generalist Sources in Online Media
| Highly cited | No |
|---|