Social‐ecological sustainability of olive farming in the Mediterranean
A review of current practices and an agroecological perspective
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22435390 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Klara Dietrich (0009-0009-9148-7793, University of Hohenheim, corresponding author), Claudia Bieling (0000-0001-5001-4150, University of Hohenheim), Corrado Ciaccia (0000-0002-1671-9349, Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria), Ingo Grass (0000-0001-7788-1940, University of Hohenheim) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-16 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | People and Nature (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2575-8314 • E-ISSN: 2575-8314 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/pan3.70392 |
| OpenAlex | W7169176750 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 76 |
Olive farming represents a prime example of a biodiversity‐rich land‐use system in the Mediterranean, deeply rooted in a long history and cultural traditions, yet it faces mounting challenges from climate change, biodiversity loss, and declining economic viability that put its sustainability at risk. As such, olive farming also serves as a model case of broader trends in agriculture, where extensive land‐use systems with long histories are increasingly under pressure to intensify production and optimize costs. Three farming systems currently dominate olive production: traditional, conventional, and sustainably intensified systems. Yet, a systematic comparison of their sustainability performance is still lacking. To address this gap, this study pursues two aims: (1) to systematically compare the sustainability dimensions of current olive farming, (2) to outline pathways for future agroecological systems. Our results reveal clear trade‐offs between sustainability dimensions in current farming systems. Traditional systems preserve cultural heritage but are often economically not viable and, in many regions, insufficiently resilient to climatic stress. Conventional systems achieve higher yields but are associated with environmental degradation and reduced long‐term resilience due to intensive input use and landscape simplification. Sustainably intensified systems strive to integrate productivity with environmental care but rely heavily on external technologies and inadequately address social equity and input dependency. Given the limitations of current approaches, agroecology emerges as a promising pathway for systemic transformation of olive farming. Nevertheless, significant knowledge gaps remain, particularly regarding the effects of specific agroecological practices on social and governance indicators and the need for the operationalization of holistic frameworks that capture interactions among practices and sustainability dimensions. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
Agriculture · Agroecology · Corporate governance · Ecological farming · Ecosystem services · Equity (law) · Social sustainability · Sustainability · Sustainability organizations · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Organic Food and Agriculture · Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
From Transition to Domains of Transformation
Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture and Its Mitigation Strategies
Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review
The PRISMA 2020 statement
Transforming food systems with agroecology
Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture
The 10 Elements of Agroecology
Ecological intensification of agriculture — sustainable by nature
Agroecology as a transformative approach to tackle climatic, food, and ecosystemic crises
Traditional land-use and nature conservation in European rural landscapes
The power of place
| Highly cited | No |
|---|