The impact mechanism of group identity on cyber-violence in digital environments
A mixed-methods study with university students as samples
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 22435583 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Yuting Wang (0000-0002-2272-9404, Nanjing University), Changkai Chen (0000-0001-8053-8617, Jiangsu Second Normal University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2026 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Páginas | 103270 |
| Data de publicação | 2026-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Social Sciences & Humanities Open (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2590-2911 • E-ISSN: 2590-2911 |
| Editora | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103270 |
| OpenAlex | W7169536449 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 52 |
Grounded in Social Identity Theory and a relational perspective, this study examined how group identity influences cyber-violence behavior and cognitive appraisal within digital environment s . The three sequential studies conducted among Chinese university students yielded the following findings: (1) In-group identity significantly increases cyber-violence, with both affective empathy and group belongingness interacting with group identity. (2) The effect of group identity on victim evaluation and willingness to assist varies by context: in-group favoritism predominates In the romantic scenarios, whereas group neutrality emerges in financial contexts. Regression analyses further suggested that cyber-violence attribution was positively associated with negative victim evaluations, whereas cyber-violence judgment and affective empathy were negatively associated with such evaluations across contexts. (3) Implicit attitudes toward cyber-violence demonstrate out-group bias, but no reliable evidence was found for a moderating effect of moral judgment on the relationship between group identity and implicit attitudes, and this null finding should be interpreted cautiously given the modest sample size. Using Chinese university students as the sample, this study provides preliminary evidence on the psychological characteristics of group interactions in digital environments. Findings should be interpreted within this specific population and generalizability to other age groups or cultural contexts requires further investigation.
Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Social Media and Politics · Team Dynamics and Performance
The Belief in a Just World
Distracted and confused?
The Overlap Between Cyberbullying and Traditional Bullying
Neural Responses to Ingroup and Outgroup Members' Suffering Predict Individual Differences in Costly Helping
School Bullying
The changing face of bullying
The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology
Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviour in bullying situations
The complex relation between morality and empathy
Bullying, Cyberbullying, and Suicide
How social learning amplifies moral outrage expression in online social networks
Power Increases Social Distance
Prosocial Motivation
The Neural Substrates of In-Group Bias
Theoretical Construction and Empirical Research on A Preschooler-friendly Implicit Association Test
Indigenization and Beyond
Predictors of out‐group empathy among majority and minority children in a conflict‐affected society
Online Moral Disengagement
Cyberbullying Among Adolescents
Bullying Perpetration, Moral Disengagement and Need for Popularity
Ideal selves and self‐esteem in people with independent or interdependent self‐construal
The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test
It’s okay to be racist
School bullying and cyberbullying – associations of student’s roles with social-cognitive and affective reactions
Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition
Feeling and thinking
Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action
Romantic Relationships and Mental Health
Resource Mobilization and Social Movements
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |