Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Perception Gaps Between Agroforestry Farmers and Local Governments on Climate Adaptation Strategies

Evidence from Sumbawa Island, Indonesia

Bibliographic Data

ID22436217
AuthorsSabila Nabichati (0009-0005-5550-5035), Dwiko Budi Permadi (0000-0002-9975-9468, Universitas Gadjah Mada, corresponding author), Dwi Laraswati (0000-0002-1238-9581, Universitas Gadjah Mada), Budiadi Budiadi (Universitas Gadjah Mada), Ronggo Sadono (0000-0003-2181-0419, Universitas Gadjah Mada), Tri Atmojo (Universitas Gadjah Mada), Ahmad Maryudi (0000-0001-5051-7217, Universitas Gadjah Mada)
Year2026
Volume27
Pages101402
Publication date2026-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTrees Forests and People (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2666-7193 • E-ISSN: 2666-7193
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.tfp.2026.101402
OpenAlexW7168394817
LanguageEN
References cited49

Climate change increasingly challenges agricultural systems in drought-prone regions, highlighting the need for adaptation strategies that reflect both local livelihood conditions and institutional priorities. In agroforestry landscapes, adaptation involves multiple actors whose perceptions of its urgency may influence planning and implementation outcomes. However, limited attention has been given to how farmers and government officials prioritize specific adaptation measures within shared socio-ecological systems. This study examined differences in the perceived urgency of climate adaptation strategies among agroforestry farmers and local government officials in Sumbawa Island, Indonesia. A convergent mixed-methods approach was employed, combining surveys and semi-structured interviews with 50 agroforestry farmers and 24 government officials. Quantitative data were analyzed using Mann–Whitney U tests, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically to explain areas of convergence and divergence. Significant differences were identified for high-productivity crops ( U = 191, p < 0.001), drought resistant ( U = 460, p = 0.089), erosion control ( U = 138, p < 0.001), bore wells ( U = 206, p < 0.001), rainwater collection ( U = 411.5, p = 0.024) seed subsidies ( U = 295, p < 0.001), labour support ( U = 278.5, p < 0.001), and insurance ( U = 257, p < 0.001), with government officials consistently assigning higher urgency scores than farmers. In contrast, mixed planting and irrigation showed little difference between stakeholder groups. The findings indicated that farmers generally prioritized strategies already embedded in existing agroforestry systems, whereas government officials placed greater emphasis on interventions that require infrastructure development, financial support, and institutional involvement. These results provide insights for developing adaptation planning processes that are more responsive to local conditions while remaining aligned with broader policy objectives.

Adaptation (eye) · Agriculture · Climate change · Government (linguistics) · Perception · Agricultural Development and Management · Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems · Forest Ecology and Conservation

  • On the nature of barriers to climate change adaptation

    Open Access•Robbert Biesbroek, G Robbert Biesbroek et al.•Regional Environmental Change•2013

  • An Anatomy of Adaptation to Climate Change and Variability

    Open Access•B Smith, Barry Smit et al.•Climatic Change•2000

  • Climate‐Smart Landscapes

    Open Access•Celia A Harvey, Mario Chacón et al.•Conservation Letters•2014

  • Transformation in a changing climate

    I Fazey, Peter Moug et al.•Climate and Development•2018

  • The Mann-Whitney U

    Open Access•Nadim Nachar•Tutorials in Quantitative Methods…•2008

  • Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research

    Open Access•Lawrence A Palinkas, Sarah Mccue Horwitz et al.•Administration and Policy in…•2015

  • Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling

    Open Access•Ilker Etikan•American Journal of Theoretical…•2016

  • A global assessment of actors and their roles in climate change adaptation

    Open Access•Jan Petzold, Tom Hawxwell et al.•Nature Climate Change•2023

  • Interrogating ‘effectiveness’ in climate change adaptation

    Open Access•Chandni Singh, Soundarya Iyer et al.•Climate and Development•2022

  • When not every response to climate change is a good one

    Shelly Eriksen, Siri Eriksen et al.•Climate and Development•2011

  • Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research

    Open Access•Albert V Norström, Christopher Cvitanovic et al.•Nature Sustainability•2020

  • Achieving mitigation and adaptation to climate change through sustainable agroforestry practices in Africa

    Open Access•Cheikh Mbow, Pete Smith et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2013

  • Metrics of water security, adaptive capacity, and agroforestry in Indonesia

    Open Access•Meine Van Noordwijk, Yeon‐su Kim et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2016

  • A comparative analysis to depict underlying attributes that might determine successful implementation of local adaptation plans

    Open Access•Silvia F Rivas, Silvia Rivas et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2021

  • Deconstructing institutional roles in climate change adaptation

    Open Access•Tafesse Matewos•Environmental Science & Policy•2019

  • Translating climate risk assessments into more effective adaptation decision-making

    Open Access•Andrew P Kythreotis, Mary Joe Hannaford et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2024

  • Options for support to agriculture and food security under climate change

    Open Access•S Vermeulen, S J Vermeulen et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2011

  • Adaptation to climate change in Ethiopia and South Africa

    Open Access•Elizabeth Bryan, Temesgen Deressa et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2009

  • A governance perspective for climate change adaptation

    Open Access•Mohammad Awal Hossen, Corinna Netherton et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2022

  • Adaptation to Climate Change in Small Island Developing States

    Open Access•Carola Klöck, Patrick Nunn•The Journal of Environment &…•2019

  • Successful adaptation to climate change across scales

    Open Access•W Neil Adger, Nigel W Arnell et al.•Global Environmental Change•2005

  • Rethinking barriers to adaptation

    Open Access•Robbert Biesbroek, G Robbert Biesbroek et al.•Global Environmental Change•2014

  • Determinants of farmers’ choice of adaptation methods to climate change in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia

    Open Access•Temesgen Deressa, Temesgen Tadesse Deressa et al.•Global Environmental Change•2009

  • Impact of forestland allocation on land use in a mountainous province of Vietnam

    Open Access•Jean-Christophe Castella, Stanislas Boissau et al.•Land Use Policy•2006

  • The governance of adaptation

    Open Access•Dave Huitema, W Neil Adger et al.•Conservation Ecology•2016

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae