Navigating interlaced spaces

The corruption–crime nexus and the erosion of democratic governance

Bibliographic Data

ID22436285
AuthorsIna Kubbe (0000-0002-2941-806X, Tel Aviv University, corresponding author), Deborah Alimi (Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne), Eran Itskovich (0000-0002-7743-5438, Hebrew University of Jerusalem)
Year2026
Volume8
Publication date2026-06-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2673-3145 • E-ISSN: 2673-3145
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpos.2026.1780702
OpenAlexW7166045934
LanguageEN
References cited46

Global trade corridors and border infrastructures have become critical interfaces where state authority, illicit economies, and private interests intersect. This article examines how interlaced governance spaces, zones where security, commerce, and regulation overlap, facilitate the convergence of organized crime and corruption, producing what is conceptualized as democratic erosion. To analyze this phenomenon, the study introduces the NAVIGAT model (Navigating Interlaced Governance and Accountability Typologies), an analytical framework that explains how hybrid institutional arrangements normalize discretion and blur the boundaries between legality and illegality. Methodologically, the study employs a comparative qualitative design, drawing on policy documents, institutional reports, investigative materials, and academic case studies across three strategic cases: Israel's hybrid border regime, the port of Marseille, and the Tangier Med industrial complex. The analysis shows how different governance configurations generate similar outcomes: the erosion of rule-based accountability, the consolidation of informal brokers, and the growing dominance of commercial and security logics in governance practices. Synthesizing across cases, the NAVIGAT model identifies three interrelated mechanisms of democratic erosion: normative erosion (the dilution of legal equality), spatial fragmentation (uneven application of oversight), and institutional adaptation (the normalization of exceptional practices). These findings demonstrate that democratic erosion can emerge incrementally from within existing governance arrangements, rather than through overt state capture or authoritarian rupture. The study contributes by reframing the corruption–crime nexus as a mode of governance rather than a deviant pathology, and by showing how global trade infrastructure functions as a site of institutional vulnerability. The findings highlight that countering organized crime requires strengthening spatial and bureaucratic accountability, not merely tightening legal enforcement. The NAVIGAT model thus provides both an analytical and diagnostic tool for identifying governance vulnerabilities in contemporary democracies.

Accountability · Bureaucracy · Corporate governance · Democracy · Principle of legality · Transnational governance · Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance · Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration · Migration, Refugees, and Integration

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access