Application of artificial intelligence in academic libraries in low- and middle-income countries
A scoping review
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22436680 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sarah Nakaziba (0000-0001-8054-1963, Kampala International University, corresponding author), Kenneth Abong (Kampala International University), Mary Namuguzi, Lydia Namugera (Makerere University), Drake Tamale (Kampala International University), Shamim Namukasa (Mulago Hospital), Doreen Nayebare (Kampala International University), Arnold Mwanzu (0000-0002-0421-0377, Aga Khan University Nairobi), Caroline Namukwaya, Ahmed Sarki |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Discover Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2731-5525 • E-ISSN: 2731-5525 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s44217-026-01308-0 |
| OpenAlex | W7133559406 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 63 |
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology provides academic libraries with an opportunity to improve users’ experience. However, the application of AI in academic libraries in low- and middle-income countries is yet to be established. Thus, this scoping review aims to assess the extent of AI utilisation in academic libraries in low- and middle-income countries. We performed searches in five databases, which included SCOPUS, Web of Science, Library and Information Science Technology Abstracts (LISTA), Academic Search Premier, and Google Scholar. The scoping review adopted the following search strategy: (Artificial intelligence OR AI OR Fourth Industrial Revolution OR 4th Industrial Revolution OR Industry 4.0 OR 4IR) AND (Application OR Implementation OR Utili*ation OR Use OR Adoption) AND (Academic Librar* OR University Librar*) AND (Challenges OR Hinderances OR Barriers). The review findings indicated that most studies reported the implemented AI tools such as Chatbots, robotics, RFID, AI text generators, and face recognition, among others. However, surprisingly, most of the AI tools were reported in single studies. The low adoption of AI technology was attributed to limited funding, fear of job security, presence of a knowledge gap, lack of infrastructure, ethical use of technology, privacy concerns, lack of management, and absence of adequate policies. Our literature search yielded no scoping review presenting the extent of AI utilisation in academic libraries in low- and middle-income countries in Africa and Asia; however, we acknowledge the availability of some systematic studies on the topic. This study aimed to improve on the already available knowledge and bridge any present gaps. Our literature yielded no scoping review presenting the extent of AI utilisation in academic libraries in low- and middle-income countries; therefore, this study aimed to fill the gap. The findings and recommendations presented in this scoping review will guide academic libraries in harnessing the implementation of AI in their services. Thus, enhancing the library users’ information seeking experiences in this technological era.
Applications of artificial intelligence · AI in Service Interactions · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Scientific Research and Technology
Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols
Chatting about ChatGPT
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews
ChatGPT in the higher education
Reading with robot and human companions in library literacy activities
You’re Fired,” Says the Robot
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |