University study programs in the AI era examined through a PRISMA guided meta analysis of global trends and regional disparities in the Western Balkans
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22436710 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Shemsedin Vehapi (0000-0003-1460-3470, AAB College), Besime Ziberi (AAB College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-27 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Discover Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2731-5525 • E-ISSN: 2731-5525 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s44217-026-01399-9 |
| OpenAlex | W7141771072 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 44 |
Artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education is becoming very important research field because of its extensive use, the absence of a thorough framework governing its use, ethical issues, and effects on student learning outcomes. In light of the increasing global commitment to incorporating AI into higher educational institutions, this study synthesizes current empirical findings using the PRISMA 2020 meta-analysis framework and estimate further the impact of AI in higher education using Meta Regression Analysis Restricted Maximum Likelihood (REML). The resulting meta-analysis from 20 studies had 16 studies that satisfied overall of the eligibility requirements. The findings indicated a moderate and statistically significant positive impact of integrating AI in higher education, with a pooled effect size of Hedges’ g = 0.685 and a 95% confidence interval of [0.389, 0.982]. A significant degree of heterogeneity across studies is also suggested by Cochran’s Q = 337.02 (p < 0.001), I2 = 95.5%, and τ2 = 0.3028. These results demonstrate significant variations in research designs, target populations, and strategies for implementing AI in educational settings, and they lend credence to the application of a random-effects model. The empirical literature’s geographical imbalance restricts the findings’ generalizability and emphasizes the critical need for regionally diverse research, especially in regions like Europe and the Western Balkans. Because there is an absence of research on AI’s use and effects in academic faculties, strategic national research is required to map how it is utilized across fields of study, examine its learning outcomes, and determine its educational consequences.
Data collection · Meta-analysis · Systematic review · Computational and Text Analysis Methods · E-Learning and Knowledge Management · Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Introduction to Meta‐Analysis
A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education
ChatGPT
Artificial intelligence in higher education
The PRISMA 2020 statement
Are postgraduate programs enabling technological and instructional leadership among future school leaders? An institutional case study
Changing assessment landscape in management education with AI-driven technologies
Retracted Article
AI in higher education
Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Students’ Academic Development
Challenges and Opportunities of Generative AI for Higher Education as Explained by ChatGPT
How to teach responsible AI in Higher Education
The impact of generative AI on university students’ learning outcomes via Bloom’s taxonomy
Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators
How Methodological Features Affect Effect Sizes in Education
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |