Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Organizing Organic

Conflict and Compromise in an Emerging Market

Bibliographic Data

ID2244275
AuthorsJoshua L Carreiro (Springfield Technical Community College, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume96
Issue1
Pagese12-e12
Publication date2017-09-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Forces (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0037-7732 • E-ISSN: 1534-7605
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/sf/sox009
OpenAlexW2588842791
LanguageEN
Citations received2

Michael Haedicke's book, Organizing Organic: Conflict and Compromise in an Emerging Market, is a welcome contribution to the study of the organic sector, which has seen tremendous growth since the late twentieth century. The growth of the sector, accompanied by the entrance of more traditional agricultural producers and retailers, has led to a significant amount of conflict and compromise among producers of organic food products. Using qualitative data and engaging with organizations scholarship, Haedicke traces the history of organic agriculture in the United States and provides an analysis of the current struggle to define the sector. The author applies the concept of institutional logics to better understand patterns of conflict and compromise in the organic sector and, in turn, uses his findings to engage in further development of organizational theory. Haedicke argues that there are two, competing, cultural understandings of the organic sector among organic producers. These cultural understandings guide participants’ actions and efforts to determine the structure of organizations and institutions within the organic sector. The first, termed “transformative,” sees the traditional organization of agricultural production as systemically flawed and calls for it to be restructured into a decentralized economy that, among other things, legitimates small-scale production and promotes civic community. The second cultural understanding, termed “expansionary,” embraces traditional business models and identifies market growth of the organic sector as the main goal of organic agriculture. Haedicke analyzes the development of these two cultural understandings; from the early years of organic farming to the battles over federal regulation in the late twentieth century and finally within the context of the current growth of the organic sector. In and of itself, Haedicke's historical account and construction of this cultural framework is useful in regard to how we understand the emergence of “big organic”—the entry of traditional corporations into the organic market—and its influence, for better or worse, on the political economy of food in the contemporary United States.

Agriculture · Compromise · Economic growth · Economics · Political science · Scholarship · Sociology · Transformative learning · History · Law · Organic Food and Agriculture

  • Politics in participatory guarantee systems for organic food production

    Open Access•Marvin Joseph F Montefrio, Alaine Taylor Johnson•Journal of Rural Studies•2018

  • Social Organization, Macro Phenomena, and Symbolic Interactionism

    Patrick J W Mcginty•Oxford Handbook of Symbolic…•2021

Citations per year0.25
Citation span2018 - 2021 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae