The selectiveness of inclusiveness
Exploring the influence of traditional religious visage on contemporary cultural tastes
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22463236 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Wen Ma (0009-0008-3166-5976, Nanjing University), Ying Li (0000-0003-0678-9535, School of Management, University College London , One Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E14 5AA), Yunsong Chen (0000-0003-3799-0071, Nanjing University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-22 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Forces (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0037-7732 • E-ISSN: 1534-7605 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/sf/soag040 |
| OpenAlex | W7155208490 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 67 |
A substantial body of literature examines the cultural strength of religion, yet there is a scarcity of work exploring how religion exerts an impact on the broader population of a secular society. Focusing on contemporary China, this study examines the relationship between religious visage, measured by the cumulative presence of Buddhist and Taoist temples, and cultural inclusiveness, captured by cultural taste entropy constructed from 749,545,472 search indices related to 38,312 song titles. Panel analyses reveal contrasting effects: Buddhist visages are associated with more selective cultural patterns, whereas Taoist visages are linked to greater diversity in cultural tastes. This demonstrates that despite world religions’ doctrinal emphasis on inclusiveness, an inherent selectiveness can still impact cultural practices in secular lives through the broader cultural environment. By shifting attention from individual religiosity to the spatial presence of religion, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of the interplay between religions and contemporary cultural practices in secular contexts.
Buddhism · Cultural diversity · Diversity (politics) · Population · Religiosity · Scarcity · Taste · Cultural Differences and Values · Religion and Society Interactions · Social and Cultural Dynamics
Entropy and diversity
Demolition and Defiance
Belief in Control
Understanding Cultural Taste
Religion, Intolerance, and Conflict
The changing impact of social background on lifestyle
The History of Taoism
Buddhism in China
The Impact of Buddhism on Chinese Material Culture
Religion and place attachment
Religion in Chinese Society
The Salience of Religion Under an Atheist State
The dialectic of Confucianism and Taoism in ancient China
From temple to table
Influence of Religion on Prosociality
Research
Is History a Process? Nonlinearity, Revitalization Theory, and the Central Metaphor of Social Science History
Chan summer camp templestay as an educational leisure and tourism activity in China
Muslims in China
Affective spaces
Understanding cultural omnivores
Subjective well-being in the new China
The anatomy of cultural omnivorousness
Religion, Space, and Place
Entropy and Popular Culture
Changing Highbrow Taste
Buddhism and Music
Is going to church good or bad for you? Denomination, attendance and mental health of children in West Scotland
Religion and Sexual Behaviors
The Geometry of Culture
Cross-lagged panel correlation
An affective religious boundary tool
Iconic Religion in Urban Space
Current Research of Taoist Ritual Music in Mainland China and Hong Kong
Temple-Building and Heritage in China
Between Secularist Ideology and Desecularizing Reality
After Secularization
A Cultural Sociology of Religion
The New Sociology of Morality
The Red, Black, and Gray Markets of Religion in China
Mapping Chinese Folk Religion in Mainland China and Taiwan
Globalization and the Religious Production of Space
Where Do Cultural Omnivores Come from? The Implications of Educational Mobility for Cultural Consumption
The Impact of Religious Identity and Social Orientations on Visual Arts Appreciation
Prestige, Proximity, and Prejudice
The Rise of Protestantism in Post-Mao China
Subjective Wellbeing of Chinese People
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |