Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

I don't know why I'm here

From Knot-Working to Not-Knowing

Bibliographic Data

ID2246985
AuthorsCharlotte Wegener (0000-0001-5600-7824, Aalborg University, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume3
Issue2
Pages246-258
Publication date2014-08-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Organizational Ethnography (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2046-6749 • E-ISSN: 2046-6757
PublisherEmerald (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1108/joe-07-2013-0016
OpenAlexW2038162444
LanguageEN
References cited24

Purpose- The purpose of this paper is to examine the idea of getting lost during field studies as a point of departure for reframing the initial research question.Design/methodology/approach- The paper presents field notes and reflections to illustrate the process of tracing innovation in the field by means of a theoretical concept - "knot-working" as proposed by Engeström (2008). By paying attention to seemingly irrelevant empirical data and experiences of being lost, the author infuses another theoretical concept - "not-knowing" as proposed by Lather (2007).Findings- By questioning research questions, it becomes possible to challenge conventional assumptions in the field under study as well as assumptions underlying existing theory. It is argued that good research questions evolve iteratively throughout a study and might be even more valuable than answers (Alvesson and Sandberg, 2013). The paper illustrates how not-knowing can serve as a methodological perspective from where ordinary held assumptions can be reconsidered, thus paving the way for novel research questions that can enhance established theory.Originality/value- The paper questions the initial research question: "How is the elderly care sector affected by innovation imperatives," and ends up posing the reverse question: How are innovation imperatives affected - or how could they be affected - by the notion of care

Cognitive reframing · Empirical research · Epistemology · Field (mathematics · Originality · Perspective (graphical · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Value (mathematics · Computer Science · Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research · Innovation, Technology, and Society · Innovative Education and Learning Practices · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

  • Constructing Research Questions

    Mats Alvesson, Jorgen Sandberg•Constructing Research Questions:…•2013

  • Thinking in Jazz

    Paul Berliner, Paul F Berliner•Thinking in Jazz•1994

  • Learning by Expanding

    Open Access•Yrjö Engeström•Learning by Expanding•2014

  • Introductory Essay—Improvisation as a Mindset for Organizational Analysis

    Karl E Weick•Organization Science•1998

  • Getting Lost

    P Lather•Getting Lost•2007

  • Creativity as Openness

    Open Access•James H Oliver, James Oliver•Health Care Analysis•2009

  • The Rationality of Caring

    Open Access•Kari Wærness•Economic and Industrial Democracy•1984

  • Employee-Driven Innovation

    Open Access•Maria Bonnafous‐Boucher, Steen Høyrup et al.•Collected Drawings of Aubrey…•2012

  • Developing qualitative research questions

    Jane Agee•International Journal of…•2009

  • On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One

    Open Access•A Sfard•Educational Researcher•1998

  • Writing With Phineas

    Open Access•Charlotte Wegener•Culture Studies ↔ Critical…•2014

  • Toward a Methodology of Encounters

    Open Access•Katryna Mccoy, Kate Mccoy•Qualitative Inquiry•2012

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae