Sociology after Humanism
A Lesson from Contemporary Science Studies
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2247288 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel Breslau (Tel Aviv University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 289-307 |
| Publication date | 2000-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sociological Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0735-2751 • E-ISSN: 1467-9558 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/0735-2751.00099 |
| OpenAlex | W2161130003 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 14 |
| References cited | 49 |
The field of science studies is the site of an explicit reflection on the ontological premises of sociology, with rival approaches defined by distinctive ways of specifying the basic constituents of reality. This article takes advantage of this debate to compare three types of ontological schemes in terms of their internal coherence and their consequences for sociology. Sociological humanism-represented by proponents of the sociology of scientific knowledge (SSK)-distinguishes between an immanent domain of social relations, a transcendent and meaningless material reality, and an intermediate, socially constructed level of knowledge, meaning, and culture. Symmetrical humanism-as found in the recent writings of Andrew Pickering-insists that society too should be placed among the constructions, thereby disqualifying it as a source of explanations for human agency and leaving a detached and self-moving human agent. The relational ontology-exemplified by the 'actor-network' approach of Bruno Latour and others-makes no a priori distinctions between humans and others, or between transcendent reality and construction, treating these properties as outcomes. The two humanist approaches are found to be incoherent as ontological schemes and also, contrary to the assumptions of the current debate, inimical to sociological explanation. And contrary to the antisociological stance of the actor-network approach, it is found that the relational ontology provides a consistent basis for sociological explanations of human practices
Agency (philosophy · Epistemology · Field (mathematics · Humanism · Meaning (existential · Ontology · Sociology · Sociology of scientific knowledge · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Critical Realism in Sociology · Emile Durkheim and Sociology · Philosophy
Mediations
For a Sociology of ‘Socionature’
The dream of transcending the human through the digital matrix
Manufactura, uso y descarte? O acerca del entramado social de los objetos cerámicos
Social Interaction
The Objects of Sociology
Agency
Infrastructuring European migration and border control
Back to Hegel? On Gillian Rose's critique of sociological reason
Performing Place in Nature Reserves
Unexpected Interactions
Counter-narratives against hardships among Syrian refugee youth and parents
Nonhumans in Social Interaction
Diagnosis as Topic and as Resource
Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature
Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action
Structural Holes
Plans and situated actions
The Interpretation of Cultures
Knowledge and social imagery
The fine line
We Have Never Been Human
The Concept of Mind
Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact
The phenomenology of the social world
The Logic of Practice
Interests and Explanation in the Social Study of Science
The Reflexive Thesis
Opening Pandora's Box
Plans and Situated Actions
Changing Order
Anti-Latour
Knowing and the Known
Changing Axes
Higher Superstition
Personal Knowledge
Commentary and Debate
The Sociology of Science
A Realist Theory of Science
The social construction of reality
Leviathan and the Air-Pump
Science and the Modern World
Intentionality
Culture in Action
Changing Order
The Mangle of Practice
Primitive Classification (Routledge Revivals)
Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation
In Other Words
Structural Holes
Posthuman Agency
The Scientist's Role in Society
Leviathan and the Air-Pump
Manifesto for a Relational Sociology
The Meaning of Data
| Unique citing works | 14 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,54 |
| Citation span | 2000 - 2024 (25) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 14 |