Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Effect of physical activity on bone mineral density assessed by limb dominance across the lifespan

Bibliographic Data

ID22474620
AuthorsPhilip D Chilibeck (0000-0003-3973-5939, University of Saskatchewan, corresponding author), K Shawn Davison, Kelly Davison (0000-0002-1965-4691, University of Saskatchewan), Digby G Sale, Colin E Webber (0009-0008-1679-3750, McMaster University), Robert A Faulkner (0000-0001-5361-3300, McMaster University)
Year2000
Volume12
Issue5
Pages633-637
Publication date2000-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Human Biology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1042-0533 • E-ISSN: 1520-6300
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/1520-6300(200009/10)12:5<633::aid-ajhb8>3.3.co;2-n
OpenAlexW4232617482
LanguageEN

Bone mineral density is higher in dominant vs. nondominant limbs, implying that the greater use of dominant limbs in everyday activities results in the deposition of more bone or that the dominant limb is genetically larger. The objective of the present study was to determine whether bone mineral density differences between dominant and nondominant arms were greater in older vs. younger women. To determine whether this was due to a greater lifetime of preferential loading of the dominant arm, differences between dominant and nondominant arms were compared to accumulated amounts of physical activities which emphasized use of the dominant arm. Bone mineral density of dominant and nondominant arms was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in groups of younger (n = 35; age = 20.9) and older (n = 53; age = 57.4) women. The difference between arms was greater in the older vs. the younger group (5.2% vs. 1.9%, respectively, P < 0.01). Within the older group, total lifetime energy expenditure during activities emphasizing loading of the dominant arm correlated with the bone mineral difference between dominant and nondominant arms (r = 0.47, P < 0.01). This implies that a greater lifetime of preferential loading of the dominant arm in the older group resulted in a greater difference between arms. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 12:633–637, 2000. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Age groups · Biology · Bone density · Bone mineral · Dominance (genetics) · Energy expenditure · Hum · Osteoporosis · Significant difference · Body Composition Measurement Techniques · Bone health and osteoporosis research · Demography · Endocrinology · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Nutrition and Health in Aging

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae