Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Marjorie Halpin , Dakota Cortez
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Dalhousie University, Sociology Department The University of Texas Austin Texas USA
ANO 2020
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Sociology of Health and Illness
ISSN 0141-9889
E-ISSN 1467-9566
EDITORA Sage Publications (United States)
DOI 10.1111/1467-9566.13059
CITAÇÕES 3
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 0ab237e9cd67cb2bbd6ef9714a8a67d0

Resumo

We consider uncertainty in relation to clinical trials for terminal non‐small cell lung cancer, which is an aggressive and difficult to treat form of cancer. Using grounded theory to analyse 85 clinical interactions between doctors, patients and family members, we argue that uncertainty is a major source of tension for terminally ill patients, with individuals confronting a choice between transitioning to palliative care or volunteering for an experimental/trial medication that might postpone death. Regardless of their efficacy, patients must also consider how such experimental treatments might impact their quality‐of‐life. We argue that clinical trials produce uncertainty through (i) discussions about the efficacy of clinical trials; (ii) the physiological consequences of clinical trial medications; and (iii) the impact clinical trials have on patient's prognostic understanding of their terminal cancer. Accordingly, while study participants encounter high prognostic certainty (i.e. they have a fatal cancer), they nonetheless experience considerable uncertainty in relation to their participation in clinical trials.

Ferramentas