Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How artificial intelligence is reshaping the autonomy and boundary work of radiologists. A qualitative study

Bibliographic Data

ID2250286
AuthorsLinda Lombi (0000-0002-8486-1021, Department of Sociology Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Milan Italy, corresponding author), Eleonora Rossero (0000-0001-6640-9405, Fundamental Rights Laboratory, Collegio Carlo Alberto Turin Italy)
Year2024
Volume46
Issue2
Pages200-218
Publication date2024-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociology of Health & Illness (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0141-9889 • E-ISSN: 1467-9566
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1467-9566.13702
PMID37573551
OpenAlexW4385789167
LanguageEN
Citations received15
References cited64

The application of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical practice is spreading, especially in technologically dense fields such as radiology, which could consequently undergo profound transformations in the near future. This article aims to qualitatively explore the potential influence of AI technologies on the professional identity of radiologists. Drawing on 12 in-depth interviews with a subgroup of radiologists who participated in a larger study, this article investigated (1) whether radiologists perceived AI as a threat to their decision-making autonomy; and (2) how radiologists perceived the future of their profession compared to other health-care professions. The findings revealed that while AI did not generally affect radiologists' decision-making autonomy, it threatened their professional and epistemic authority. Two discursive strategies were identified to explain these findings. The first strategy emphasised radiologists' specific expertise and knowledge that extends beyond interpreting images, a task performed with high accuracy by AI machines. The second strategy underscored the fostering of radiologists' professional prestige through developing expertise in using AI technologies, a skill that would distinguish them from other clinicians who did not pose this knowledge. This study identifies AI machines as status objects and useful tools in performing boundary work in and around the radiological profession

Affect (linguistics · Autonomy · Boundary-work · Health care · Identity (music · Management · Medical education · Political science · Prestige · Social science · Sociology · Task (project management · Work (physics · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Engineering · Medicine · Psychology · Radiology practices and education

  • “Dr. TikTok”

    Open Access•Caroline Petronis•Social Science & Medicine•2026

  • “I Call It My Free Therapist!”

    Open Access•Judith Velasco, Juan A Moriana et al.•AI & Society•2026

  • Resistance, Adaptation, and Irreducible Paradox

    Open Access•Francesca Guerra, Maartje H N Schermer et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2026

  • When AI Disagrees

    Open Access•Cheng Chen, Yuan Sun et al.•International Journal of…•2026

  • “Sailing the ship while building it”

    Open Access•A E Raz, Liat Bela Lifshitz-Milwidsky et al.•SSM - Qualitative Research in…•2025

  • Mitigating AI-induced professional identity threat and fostering adoption in the workplace

    Open Access•Liah Shonhe, Qingfei Min•AI & Society•2025

  • The risk of trust

    Riccardo Pronzato, Marta Gibin et al.•Health Risk & Society•2026

  • Algorithmic reconfiguration of mental health care

    Open Access•Giulia Banfi, Noemi Crescentini•Health Risk & Society•2026

  • When the white coat meets the code

    L Sartori, Marianna Musmeci et al.•Health Risk & Society•2026

  • Recalibrating expectations in robotic and AI-enhanced care

    Eleonora Rossero, Linda Lombi•Health Risk & Society•2026

  • ‘Where’s the line? It’s an absurd line’

    Open Access•Thomas Corbin, Phillip Dawson et al.•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2025

  • AI in Healthcare

    Open Access•Laurianne Terlinden, Aurélie Verachtert et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2026

  • Sentencing as a human process? Human judges’ experiences of machine-based sentencing

    Open Access•Netanel Dagan, Shmuel Baron et al.•The British Journal of Criminology•2026

  • A medical profession towards empowerment? The uncertain future of digitalization in private general practice

    Open Access•Marie Ghis Malfilatre, Séverine Louvel•Social Science & Medicine•2025

  • The promise of artificial intelligence in health

    Open Access•A Watson, Vaughan Wozniak-O’connor et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•2025

  • Rationalizing medical work

    Marc Berg•Rationalizing medical work•1997

  • The System of Professions

    Andrew Abbott•System of Professions•1988

  • Doing Template Analysis

    Noemia King, Nigel King•Qualitative Organizational Research•2012

  • To Engage or Not to Engage with AI for Critical Judgments

    Sarah Lebovitz, Hila Lifshitz‐Assaf et al.•Organization Science•2022

  • Artificial intelligence in healthcare

    Open Access•Fei Jiang, Yong Jiang et al.•Stroke and Vascular Neurology•2017

  • Predicting the Future — Big Data, Machine Learning, and Clinical Medicine

    Gérard Mauger, Ziad Obermeyer et al.•New England Journal of Medicine•2016

  • Analytics in action

    Claire Maiers•Information Communication & Society•2017

  • Reassembling the Social

    Open Access•Bruno Latour•Equal Opportunities International•2008

  • Defining a Profession

    Open Access•Mike Saks•Professions and Professionalism•2012

  • Reassembling the Social

    Bruno Latour•REASSEMBLING THE SOCIAL: AN…•2005

  • Science/Non‐science and Boundary Work

    Open Access•Yuri Jack Gómez‐morale, Yuri Jack Gómez‐Morales•The Blackwell Encyclopedia of…•2015

  • Towards a Theory of Care Transition

    Open Access•Michael Bury, D G Taylor et al.•Social Theory & Health•2008

  • Doing Distinctions

    Open Access•Regula Valérie Burri•Social Studies of Science•2008

  • Two Decades of Developments in Qualitative Inquiry

    Open Access•Michael Quinn Patton•Qualitative Social Work•2002

  • Demarcating Epidemiology

    Open Access•Olga Amsterdamska•Science Technology & Human Values•2005

  • Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science

    Thomas F Gieryn•American Sociological Review•1983

  • Invisible walls within multidisciplinary teams

    Open Access•Elisa Liberati, Elisa Giulia Liberati et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2016

  • Medical dominance in Italy

    Open Access•Willem Tousijn•Social Science & Medicine•2002

  • Performing boundary work

    Open Access•Kreg Lindberg, Kajsa Lindberg et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2017

  • Objectification, standardization, and commodification in health care

    Open Access•Stefan Timmerman, Rene Almeling•Social Science & Medicine•2009

  • Pixels, Patterns and Problems of Vision

    Open Access•Brian Dolan, Allison Tillack et al.•History of Science•2010

  • Slaps, Punches, Pinches-But not Violence

    Open Access•Malin Akerstrom•Symbolic Interaction•2002

  • Dismembering organisation

    Open Access•Simon Bailey, Dean Pierides et al.•Current Sociology•2020

  • The Changing Nature of Professional Control

    Eliot Freidson•Annual Review of Sociology•1984

  • Introducing the electronic patient record (EPR) in a hospital setting

    Open Access•Erna Håland•Sociology of Health & Illness•2012

  • The practice of medical technology

    Open Access•Stefan Timmerman, Marc Berg•Sociology of Health & Illness•2003

Unique citing works15
Citations per year15
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 12

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae