Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Mark Leighton
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Kellogg School of Management Northwestern University
ANO 2016
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO American Anthropologist
ISSN 0002-7294
E-ISSN 0002-7294
EDITORA Shima Publications (Australia)
DOI 10.1111/aman.12682
CITAÇÕES 3
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 b2187f34a63786d0273a9fedd3ea0334

Resumo

Archaeology is a science with an intimate investment in the bodies that labor to produce its objects of knowledge. Data comes into being through tactile skills: eyes that see, hands that touch, voices that name and debate. It matters, therefore, who constitutes and controls the labor force; yet little has been written about archaeological workers. Here I outline the relationship between archaeologists and indigenous workers at Tiwanaku, Bolivia, showing that archaeologists did not have direct control over labor on their sites, including who was hired, how much they were paid, and how jobs were defined. These decisions are made by the community's Mallkus in active (sometimes protracted) negotiation with the archaeologists. While active and constant, the process of bargaining was not necessarily conflicted; moreover, it led to a form of labor organization and scientific practice that was neither entirely 'Aymara/indigenous' nor entirely 'archaeological/scientific.' It thus forms an intriguing example of a form of hybrid scientific practice that incorporates two very different conceptualizations of labor, both as it relates to specific individuals (who is capable of occupying specific jobs) and how it is valued (what the underlying purpose of scientific work should be).

Ferramentas