Why Don't Anthropologists Care about Learning (or Education or School)? An Immodest Proposal for an Integrative Anthropology of Learning Whose Time Has Finally Come
Dados Bibliográficos
AUTOR(ES) | |
---|---|
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) | Department of Anthropology University of Notre Dame Notre Dame IN 46556 USA |
ANO | 2019 |
TIPO | Artigo |
PERIÓDICO | American Anthropologist |
ISSN | 0002-7294 |
E-ISSN | 0002-7294 |
EDITORA | Shima Publications (Australia) |
DOI | 10.1111/aman.13268 |
CITAÇÕES | 7 |
ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-18 |
MD5 |
3b2b7be0c4a9f01957c135ec0f6ae91b
|
Resumo
This article proposes a twenty‐first‐century anthropology of learning: comparative, integrating, powerful, speaking truth to power, and engaging in ethnographic, humanistic, and scientific investigation. Such an enterprise welcomes a wide variety of methods. An anthropology of learning includes—but distinguishes—education, socialization, enculturation, and schooling. It encompasses formal, informal, and nonformal learning. It grapples with definitions of learning and emphasizes that these are part of every human experience. Some learning happens in schools; only some of the learning matches what is explicitly intended. Sometimes learning is fostered by teaching, but pedagogy is not always required. Anthropology is an ideal discipline for investigating learning, education, and schooling—but these topics are not widely known in the field in general. The article proposes three centers of attention and provides an extended example, the 'thirty‐million‐word gap.' [learning, schooling, education, word gap]