Comment on Katz
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22601822 |
|---|---|
| Authors | A S Cohan (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1981 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 122-123 |
| Publication date | 1981-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-1234 • E-ISSN: 1469-2112 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0007123400002507 |
| OpenAlex | W1975770054 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
Professor Katz raises a number of points, but I shall limit myself to four. Firstly, I accept his argument that the way in which parties nominate candidates, even over-nomination, may be functional for party unity. Indeed, nowhere in the previous articles has anything else been suggested.
Argument (complex analysis) · Epistemology · Law and economics · Limit (mathematics) · NOMINATE · Nomination · Political science · Sociology · Statistics · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Mathematics · Medicine · Philosophy · Political and Economic history of UK and US
| Citations per year | 0.08 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2014 - 2014 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |