Data Protection, with Love
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2264342 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rocco Bellanova (0000-0001-6222-6636, Peace Research Institute Oslo, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 112-115 |
| Publication date | 2014-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Political Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1749-5679 • E-ISSN: 1749-5687 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/ips.12045 |
| OpenAlex | W2090586498 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 9 |
How to engage with the politics of privacy in the age of preemptive security? My suggestion is to start with data protection. Which, following De Hert and Gutwirth (2006), is not exactly the same of privacy. Extrapolating from their analysis of the two as different â legal toolsâ , I would say that privacy and data protection are two slightly different rationales of power relations: the one of privacy based on the â opacity of the individualâ , and the one of data protection on the â transparency and accountability of the powerfulâ (Gutwirth and De Hert 2008: 275, emphasis in original). These rationales (attempt to) orientate two different loose dispositifs, each formed by a composite ensemble of elements. Some of these elements are peculiar to each dispositif, while others are shared or encompassed by both
Criminology · Sociology · COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing · Global Security and Public Health · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,56 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2025 (9) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |