Negation of lexical have in conversational English

Bibliographic Data

ID2264823
AuthorsGerald Nelson (0000-0002-6626-2172, University College London, corresponding author)
Year2004
Volume23
Issue2
Pages299-308
Publication date2004-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueWorld Englishes (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0883-2919 • E-ISSN: 1467-971X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.0883-2919.2004.00353.x
OpenAlexW2001224265
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited6

The lexical verb have may be negated in a very wide variety of ways, e.g. I don't have (any) money/I haven't any money/I haven't got any money/I have no money/I've got no money. Previous research has shown that the choice of negation pattern distinguishes very clearly between American English (AmE) and British English (BrE). American speakers show a 90 per cent preference for I have no money, while British speakers show an overall preference for I haven't got any money, though they also frequently use the other available patterns.In this paper I examine the negation of lexical have in corpus data from Great Britain, New Zealand, India, Hong Kong, and Singapore. My initial hypothesis is that the three Outer Circle varieties (Hong Kong, India, Singapore) should tend to follow one or other of the two dominant "models," that is, they should follow either the American preference or the very different British preference. In fact, the results do not support this hypothesis. The Outer Circle varieties are shown to form a very distinct group of their own, in terms of the negation of lexical have

American English · British English · Combinatorics · Haven · Lexical item · Linguistics · Negation · Preference · Statistics · Variety (cybernetics · Verb · History · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub