Dados Bibliográficos

Resumo

The current medical malpractice crisis in the United States provides an opportunity to explore the medical profession's response to threats to its autonomy of practice. Drawing on commentary in medical journals, I reveal the way in which physicians, and some lawyers, have explicitly targeted doctor‐patient interaction as a seat for malpractice reform. A good deal of attention is being given to developing a better rapport with patients, providing information and involving the patient in decision‐making about care. Such reforms should be welcomed. But any benefits need to be weighed against the possibility that changes in the doctor‐patient relationship may also have a covert purpose; as reform is focused at the interactional level, attention is drawn away from medical practice to the patient as the source of negligent injury. This can have negative consequences for patients who, in responding to this interactional gloss, may fail to gain compensation for the real errors of medical practice.

Referências Citadas