Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

In whose interest? Relationships between health consumer groups and the pharmaceutical industry in the UK

Bibliographic Data

ID2265987
AuthorsKathryn Jones (0000-0003-3815-5713, De Montfort University, corresponding author)
Year2008
Volume30
Issue6
Pages929-943
Publication date2008-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociology of Health & Illness (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0141-9889 • E-ISSN: 1467-9566
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01109.x
PMID18761512
OpenAlexW2112937163
LanguageEN
Citations received18
References cited13

This paper explores how health consumer groups in the UK disclose and manage links with pharmaceutical companies in the context of their growing involvement in the policy process. In particular, it examines claims that industry engages with groups in an attempt to capture the groups' policy agenda, thereby increasing industry's political influence. Drawing on theories of disclosure, analysis of group and industry websites revealed a varying level of detail on the nature and extent of relationships. Only 26 per cent of consumer groups known to be in receipt of industry financial or in-kind support openly acknowledged this. Interviews undertaken with representatives from consumer groups, industry and other health-care stakeholders, highlighted a coincidence of aims between the two sectors, an acknowledgement that collaboration was inevitable, and tacit support for policy guidelines to manage conflicts of interest. The paper concludes by arguing that while claims of organisational capture are over-stated, the shallow approach to transparency adopted by the majority of companies and groups strengthens critiques of undue influence. This may ultimately reduce policy makers' willingness to see consumer groups as the legitimate voice of patients, users and carers in the policy process

Acknowledgement · Business · Consumer Advocacy · Context (archaeology) · Economic growth · Economics · Health care · Pharmaceutical industry · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Receipt · Transparency (behavior) · Undue influence · Accounting · Healthcare cost, quality, practices · Law · Marketing · Medicine · Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy · Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare

  • Health social movements and the hybridisation of ‘cause regimes

    Celia Roberts, I Tyler et al.•Social movement studies•2016

  • Commercial influences on patient and public involvement

    Open Access•Marita Hennessy, Tom Fahey et al.•Health Promotion International•2024

  • Sociología de la evaluación médica. Problemas metodológicos y contexto socioeconómico de los ensayos clínicos

    Open Access•Juan Javier Sánchez Carrión•Papers Revista de Sociologia•2014

  • Número complet

    Open Access•Equip De Redacció•Papers Revista de Sociologia•2013

  • Regulating Pharmaceutical Industry Marketing

    Open Access•Shai Mulinari•Sociology Compass•2016

  • Dancing in the Dark

    Open Access•Nanna Alida G Fredheim•Journalism Studies•2020

  • The pharmaceuticalisation of society? A framework for analysis

    Open Access•Simon J Williams, Paul Martins et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•2011

  • The PrEP response in England

    Open Access•Alvaro Martinez-Lacabe•Critical Public Health•2020

  • Financial relationships between patient and consumer representatives and the health industry

    Open Access•Joanne Khabsa, Aline Semaan et al.•Health Expectations•2020

  • Patient participation in collective healthcare decision making

    Open Access•Hester Van De Bovenkamp, Hester M Van De Bovenkamp et al.•Health Expectations•2010

  • On the prohibition of conflicts of interest in pharmaceutical regulation

    Open Access•John Abraham, Julian Abraham•Social Science & Medicine•2010

  • Chasing cures

    Open Access•Deirdre Pinto, Dominique Martins et al.•BioSocieties•2018

  • Transactional Experiences of Existential Anxiety as a Barrier to Effective Humanistic Intervention

    Open Access•Noel Hunter, Tristan V Barsky•Journal of Humanistic Psychology•2016

  • Is regulatory innovation fit for purpose? A case study of adaptive regulation for advanced biotherapeutics

    Open Access•Giovanni De Grandis, Irina Bra et al.•Regulation & Governance•2023

  • The voluntary sector and health policy

    Open Access•Rob Baggott, Kathryn Jones•Social Science & Medicine•2014

  • Patient involvement in drug licensing

    Open Access•Nicky Britten, Sarah Denford et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2015

  • Everyday drug diversions

    Open Access•Scott Vrecko•Social Science & Medicine•2015

  • Pharmaceuticalization of Society in Context

    Open Access•John Abraham•Sociology•2010

  • Health Policy and Politics

    Maria Petmesidou, Kevin Featherstone et al.•Oxford Handbook of Modern Greek…•2020

  • The New Politics of Medicine

    Open Access•B Salter•The New Politics of Medicine•2004

  • Health consumer and patients' organizations in Europe

    Open Access•Rob Baggott, Rudolf Forster•Health Expectations•2008

  • Empirical uncertainty and moral contest

    Open Access•Evan Doran, Ian Kerridge et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2006

  • Pills, Power, People

    Open Access•Joan Busfield•Sociology•2006

  • Health consumer groups in the UK

    Open Access•Judith Allsop, Kathryn Jones et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•2004

Unique citing works18
Citations per year1,13
Citation span2010 - 2024 (15)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 17

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae