Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Creating history

Documents and Patient Participation in Nurse-Patient Interviews

Datos Bibliográficos

ID2266092
AutoresAled Jones (0000-0002-2921-8236, Swansea University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2009
Volumen31
Número6
Páginas907-923
Fecha de publicación2009-09-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaSociology of Health & Illness (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0141-9889 • E-ISSN: 1467-9566
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01190.x
PMID19843273
OpenAlexW2160744515
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas13
Referencias citadas32

Strongly worded directives regarding the need for increased patient participation during nursing interaction with patients have recently appeared in a range of 'best-practice' documents. This paper focuses on one area of nurse-patient communication, the hospital admission interview, which has been put forward as an ideal arena for increased patient participation. It uses data from a total of 27 admission interviews, extensive periods of participant observation and analysis of nursing records to examine how hospital admission interviews are performed by nurses and patients. Analysis shows that topics discussed during admission closely follow the layout of the admission document which nurses complete during the interview. Whilst it is tempting to describe the admission document as a 'super technological power' in influencing the interaction and restricting patient participation, this analysis attempts a more rounded reading of the data. Findings demonstrate that, whilst opportunities for patient participation were rare, admission interviews are complex interactional episodes that often belie simplistic or prescriptive guidance regarding interaction between nurses and patients. In particular, issue is taken with the lack of contextual and conceptual clarity with which best-practice guidelines are written

CLARITY · Participant observation · Reading (process) · Sociology · Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Medicine · Nursing · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology

  • When do we want the final discharge?’ How the potential tensions between medical expertise and institutional requirements are dealt with in discharge planning

    Open Access•Sara Keel, Veronika Schoeb•Cahiers du Centre de Linguistique…•2015

  • Bureaucratic Routes and Documentary Temporalities of a Conscript Questionnaire in a Human Rights Organization

    Nikita Shevchenko•Antropologicheskij forum•2023

  • Assumptions embedded in wh-questions

    Open Access•Veronika Schoeb•Studies in Communication Sciences•2014

  • Patient participation in discharge planning decisions in the frame of Primary Nursing approach

    Open Access•Sara Riva, Peter J Schulz et al.•Studies in Communication Sciences•2014

  • Paper Practices in Institutional Talk

    Open Access•Mateusz Dolata, Gerhard Schwabe•Computer Supported Cooperative…•2017

  • Use of the functional independence measure in Japanese rehabilitation team interaction

    Open Access•Hiroaki Izumi•Discourse Studies•2019

  • Dealing with numbers

    Open Access•Salla Kurhila, Inkeri Lehtimaja•Discourse Studies•2019

  • Practices of patient participation

    Open Access•Inkeri Lehtimaja, Salla Kurhila•Discourse Studies•2022

  • The Multifaceted Use of a Written Artifact in Student Supervision

    Open Access•Gunilla Jansson•Education Research International•2011

  • "What happened?" From talk to text in police interrogations

    Tessa C Van Charldorp•Language & Communication•2014

  • Embodied participation

    Open Access•Elena Davitti, Sergio Pasquandrea•Journal of Pragmatics•2017

  • Documentary disorders

    Open Access•Ramah Mckay•American Ethnologist•2012

  • Bridging the discursive gap between lay and medical discourse in care coordination

    Open Access•Rod Sheaff, Joyce Halliday et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•2017

  • Text in context

    Graham Watson, R M Seiler et al.•Text in context•1992

  • Structures of Social Action

    Open Access•John Heritage, J Maxwell Atkinson•Structures of Social Action•1985

  • Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction

    Open Access•C Heath, Katherine Nicholls•Body Movement and Speech in…•1986

  • Street-Level Bureaucracy

    Michael Lipsky•Michigan Law Review•1981

  • Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments

    Open Access•A Pomerantz•Structures of Social Action•1985

  • Taking the history

    Open Access•Elizabeth A Boyd, Elizabeth Boyd et al.•Communication in Medical Care•2006

  • Talk at work

    John Heritage, Paul Drew•Talk at work•1992

  • Studies in Social Interaction

    Christopher Jenks•Studies in Social Interaction•2014

  • Doing qualitative research

    Robyn Henderson•Studies in Continuing Education•2011

  • Understanding Qualitative Research and Ethnomethodology

    Paul Ten Have•Understanding Qualitative…•2004

  • What Does the Use of a Computerized Checklist Mean for Patient-Centered Care? The Example of a Routine Diabetes Review

    Open Access•Penny Rhodes, Mark Langdon et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2006

  • Conversation Analysis and the Professional Stocks of Interactional Knowledge

    Open Access•Anssi Peräkylä, Sanna Vehvilƒinen•Discourse & Society•2003

  • Online commentary in acute medical visits

    Open Access•J Heritage, T Stivers•Social Science & Medicine•1999

  • Revealing moments

    Open Access•Wayne A Beach, C N Dixson•Social Science & Medicine•2001

  • Looking means listening

    Open Access•Johanna Ruusuvuori•Social Science & Medicine•2001

  • The Multiple Bodies of the Medical Record

    Open Access•Marc Berg, G C Bowker et al.•Sociological Quarterly•1997

  • Practices of reading and writing

    Open Access•Marc Berg•Sociology of Health & Illness•1996

  • The practice of medical technology

    Open Access•Stefan Timmerman, Marc Berg•Sociology of Health & Illness•2003

  • Technology and medical practice

    Open Access•C Heath, Paul Luff et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•2003

  • Discriminating Customers, Responsible Patients, Empowered Users

    Open Access•Janet Newman, Elizabeth Vidler•Journal of Social Policy•2006

Obras citantes distintas13
Citas por año0,87
Intervalo de citas2011 - 2023 (13)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 11
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae