Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) P. Atkinson , N. Stephens , J. Lewis
ANO 2013
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Sociology of Health and Illness
ISSN 0141-9889
E-ISSN 1467-9566
EDITORA Sage Publications (United States)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01482.x
CITAÇÕES 3
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 551699192c6a351ed8575ef6204ecb04

Resumo

Contemporary biomedical research is conducted amidst regimes of national and transnational regulation. Regulation, like rules generally, cannot specify all the practicalities of their application. Regulations for biomedical research impose considerable constraints on laboratories and others. In principle, there is a never‐ending regress whereby scientists have to provide increasingly more guarantees that protocols have been followed, standards reached and maintained, and rules adhered to. In practice, regulatory regress is not the actual outcome, as actors find ways of establishing closure for all practical purposes. Based on ethnographic case studies of two sites of biomedical work – the UK Stem Cell Bank and an anonymous laboratory working with primary human foetal material – this article documents the possibility of regulatory regress and strategies aimed at its closure.

Ferramentas