Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Concentration without cumulative advantage

The distribution of news source attention in online communities

Bibliographic Data

ID22693145
AuthorsNick Hagar (0000-0001-5110-3737, Communication Studies, Northwestern University , Evanston, IL, USA, corresponding author), Aaron Shaw (0000-0003-4330-957X, Communication Studies, Northwestern University , Evanston, IL, USA)
Year2022
Volume72
Issue6
Pages675-686
Publication date2022-11-25
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Communication (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-9916 • E-ISSN: 1460-2466
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/joc/jqac032
OpenAlexW4296676414
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited34

Many attention markets exhibit stable patterns of concentration, where a few producers attract and sustain a far greater share of the audience than others. This inequality often follows patterns consistent with cumulative advantage, a process in which performance compounds over time. Attention to news sources online possesses these characteristics; however, online audiences also fragment across many disparate news producers. How do social media and recommender systems contribute to these attention dynamics? In this study, we examine two paradigmatic models: concentration driven by cumulative advantage and fragmentation driven by stochasticity. We evaluate these models against a large-scale empirical dataset of news source attention in the popular social media site Reddit. While we find high levels of attention concentration, we do not find the stable popularity over time that characterizes cumulative advantage. Rather, sources gain and lose popularity seemingly at random, aligning with a stochastic model. These results demonstrate the persistence of attention inequality, even in the absence of a strong driving mechanism. They also suggest that social media systems can undermine the accumulation of attention to the most prominent news sources. Digital attention markets striving for more equitable allocation require novel mechanisms of organizing and distributing information.

Advertising · Biology · Business · Cumulative effects · Empirical evidence · Popularity · Social media · World Wide Web · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Computer Science · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • El lobbying de las Organizaciones de la Sociedad Civil en España

    Open Access•Sergio Álvarez Sánchez, Alfredo Arceo Vacas•Estudios sobre el Mensaje…•2023

  • Effective Headlines of Newspaper Articles in a Digital Environment

    Open Access•Jeffrey Kuiken, Anne Schuth et al.•Digital Journalism•2017

  • From Newsworthiness to Shareworthiness

    Open Access•Damian Trilling, Petro Tolochko et al.•Journalism & Mass Communication…•2017

  • Ranger

    Open Access•Marvin N Wright, Andreas Ziegler•Journal of Statistical Software•2017

  • How Do Global Audiences Take Shape? The Role of Institutions and Culture in Patterns of Web Use

    Open Access•Harsh Taneja, James G Webster•Journal of Communication•2015

  • Laboratories of Oligarchy? How the Iron Law Extends to Peer Production

    Open Access•Aaron Shaw, Benjamin Mako Hill•Journal of Communication•2014

  • The Dynamics of Audience Fragmentation

    Open Access•James G Webster, Thomas B Ksiazek•Journal of Communication•2012

  • Are News Audiences Increasingly Fragmented? A Cross-National Comparative Analysis of Cross-Platform News Audience Fragmentation and Duplication

    Open Access•Richard Fletcher, R K Nielsen•Journal of Communication•2017

  • Network Propaganda

    Open Access•Yochai Benkler, Yochai Roberts Benkler et al.•Network Propaganda•2018

  • Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality

    T Diprete, Thomas A Diprete et al.•Annual Review of Sociology•2006

  • The Problem of Journalism

    Robert W Mcchesney•Journalism Studies•2003

  • Going with the flow

    Open Access•Angela Xiao Wu, Harsh Taneja et al.•New Media & Society•2020

  • The small, disloyal fake news audience

    Open Access•Jacob L Nelson, Harsh Taneja•New Media & Society•2018

  • Media consumption across platforms

    Open Access•Harsh Taneja, James G Webster et al.•New Media & Society•2012

  • We are what we click

    Open Access•Mykola Makhortykh, Claes H De Vreese et al.•New Media & Society•2020

  • Audience activity and media use

    Alan M Rubin, Alan Rubin•Communication Monographs•1993

  • On the Democratic Role of News Recommenders

    Open Access•Natali Helberger•Digital Journalism•2019

  • Between creative and quantified audiences

    Open Access•C W Anderson, CW Anderson•Journalism•2011

  • When More Media Equals Less News

    Pablo J Boczkowski, Martin De Santos•Political Communication•2007

  • Curated Flows

    Open Access•Kjerstin Thorson, Caroline Wells•Communication Theory•2015

  • The Duality of Media

    Open Access•James G Webster•Communication Theory•2011

  • The Myth of Partisan Selective Exposure

    Open Access•Jacob L Nelson, James G Webster•Social Media + Society•2017

  • Centralized and Decentralized Gatekeeping in an Open Online Collective

    Open Access•Aaron Shaw•Latin American Politics and Society•2012

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae