Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Persuasive Arguments Theory A Test of Assumptions

Bibliographic Data

ID2269587
AuthorsRenée A Meyers (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, corresponding author)
Year1989
Volume15
Issue3
Pages357-381
Publication date1989-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHuman Communication Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0360-3989 • E-ISSN: 1468-2958
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/j.1468-2958.1989.tb00189.x
OpenAlexW2100372485
LanguageEN
Citations received18
References cited45

Persuasive Arguments Theory (PAT) is a noninteractionl theory of group decision making that predicts decision outcomes from the cognitive arguments individuals generate prior to discussion. PAT proponents do not view discussion as a crucial determinant of decision outcomes, but rather as one possible medium for information exchange. On this view, they assume members’ cognitive arguments correspond to arguments produced in discussion and group influence is a function of these stable structures produced outside interaction. As part of a larger research program undertaken to evaluate PAT, this article assesses PAT assumptions about argument and argument influence. Following a review and critique of PAT, five hypotheses are advanced to test its assumptions. Results revealed little correspondence between cognitive and discussion arguments in number, content, or persuasiveness. Additionally, PAT assumptions about argument influence were not supported. Implications for PAT and for the role of communication in group decision making are discussed

Argument (complex analysis · Cognition · Epistemology · Function (biology · Group Decision Making · Test (biology · Conflict Management and Negotiation · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology · Team Dynamics and Performance

  • Structuration Theory in Small Group Communication

    Bryan Seyfarth•Annals of the International…•2000

  • Applying Communication Theories toward Designing Compliance-Gaining Techniques in Customer Dissatisfaction

    Open Access•Jonathan Matusitz, Gerald-Mark Breen•PASOS Revista de Turismo y…•2011

  • Who endorses online hate? The roles of ideology and knowledge in South Korean perceptions of anti-Chinese slurs

    Open Access•Yu Jeong Hwang•Online Media and Global…•2025

  • Perspectives on Group Argument

    Renée A Meyers, David R Seibold•Annals of the International…•1990

  • Extending the Conversational Argument Coding Scheme in Studies of Argument Quality in Group Deliberations

    David R Seibold, Daisy Lemus et al.•Communication Methods and Measures•2010

  • Extending the Conversational Argument Coding Scheme

    Renée A Meyers, Dale E Brashers•Communication Methods and Measures•2010

  • Argument in group decision making

    Renée A Meyers, Dale E Brashers•Communication Monographs•1998

  • At the Convergence of Input and Process Models of Group Discussion

    Joseph A Bonito, John Gastil et al.•Communication Monographs•2014

  • Pre‐deliberation moderation on choice dilemmas

    David Dryden Henningsen, Mary Lynn Miller Henningsen•Communication Monographs•2004

  • A valence-based account of group interaction and decision making

    Joseph A Bonito, Joann Keyton•Communication Monographs•2021

  • Convergence of intrapersonal and interpersonal processes across group meetings

    Jennifer N Ervin, Joseph A Bonito et al.•Communication Monographs•2016

  • Participatory Policymaking Across Cultural Cognitive Divides

    Open Access•John Gastil, Katherine R Knobloch et al.•Public Administration•2016

  • A Local Model of Information Sharing in Small Groups

    Open Access•Joseph A Bonito•Communication Theory•2007

  • An Information-Processing Model of Jury Decision Making

    Open Access•Franklin J Boster, J E Hunter et al.•Communication Research•1991

  • Deindividuation Effects on Group Polarization in Computer-Mediated Communication

    Open Access•E J Lee, Eun-Ju Lee•Journal of Communication•2006

  • The Influence of Communication Processes on Group Outcomes

    Open Access•Dean E Hewes•Human Communication Research•2009

  • Changing Conceptions of "Message Effects" A 24-Year Overview

    Open Access•Dale E Brashers, Sally Jackson•Human Communication Research•1999

  • Ambiguity and Communication Effects on Small Group Decision-Making Performance

    Open Access•Abran J Salazar•Human Communication Research•1996

  • Advances In Experimental Social Psychology

    Bertram Gawronski•Advances in Experimental Social…•2022

  • Content Analysis

    Mack Shelley, Klaus Krippendorff•Journal of the American…•1984

  • Studies of independence and conformity

    Solomon E Asch•The Psychological Monographs•1956

  • Comment on "The Distribution of Participation in Group Discussions" as Related to Group Size

    Paul D Reynolds•American Sociological Review•1971

  • Unitizing and categorizing problems in coding qualitative data

    Open Access•Harold Guetzkow•Journal of Clinical Psychology•1950

  • Decision Making--A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment

    Larry Elowitz, Irving L Janis et al.•Military Affairs•1978

  • The comparative utility of three types of behavioral units for interaction analysis

    John D Hatfield, Deborah Weider‐hatfield•Communication Monographs•1978

  • A comparison of normative and interactional explanations of group decision‐making

    Marshall Scott Poole, Robert D Mcphee et al.•Communication Monographs•1982

  • Novel argumentation and attitude change

    Open Access•Amiram D Vinokur, Amiram Vinokur et al.•European Journal of Social…•1978

  • Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion

    John T Cacioppo, Richard E Petty•Journal of Personality and Social…•1979

  • Group communication

    Dennis S Gouran•Quarterly Journal of Speech•1973

  • Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization

    Open Access•Eugene Burnstein, Amiram Vinokur•Journal of Experimental Social…•1977

  • Whatever happened to the group in social psychology

    Open Access•Ivan D Steiner•Journal of Experimental Social…•1974

  • Risky and cautious shifts in group decisions

    Open Access•James A F Stoner•Journal of Experimental Social…•1968

  • Group decision‐making as a structurational process

    Marshall Scott Poole, David R Seibold et al.•Quarterly Journal of Speech•1985

  • Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses

    Richard E Petty, John T Cacioppo•Journal of Personality and Social…•1979

  • Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion

    Garold Stasser, William Titus•Journal of Personality and Social…•1987

  • Pooling of unshared information in group decision making

    Garold Stasser, William Titus•Journal of Personality and Social…•1985

  • Group decision and social interaction

    Janet Haggerty Davis, James H Davis•Psychological Review•1973

  • Testing two classes of theories about group induced shifts in individual choice

    Open Access•Eugene Burnstein, Amiram D Vinokur et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•1973

  • A decision-making analysis of persuasive argumentation and the choice-shift effect

    Open Access•Amiram D Vinokur, Amiram Vinokur et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•1975

  • Effects of partially shared persuasive arguments on group-induced shifts

    Amiram D Vinokur, Amiram Vinokur et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1974

  • Effects of source magnification of cognitive effort on attitudes

    Stephen G Harkin, Stephen G Harkins et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1981

  • Identifiability as a deterrant to social loafing

    Kimberly D Williams, Kipling Williams et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1981

  • A Study of Interaction and Consensus in Different Sized Groups

    A Paul Hare•American Sociological Review•1952

  • Groups, Leadership, and Men

    Paul H Besanceney, Harold Guetzkow et al.•The American Catholic Sociological…•1952

  • Interaction Rates of Jurors Aligned in Factions

    Charles H Hawkins•American Sociological Review•1962

  • The group polarization phenomenon

    David G Myers, Helmut Lamm•Psychological Bulletin•1976

Unique citing works18
Citations per year0,5
Citation span1990 - 2025 (36)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 16
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae