Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Why Do People Reject New Technologies and Stymie Organizational Changes of Which They Are in Favor? Exploring Misalignments Between Social Interactions and Materiality

Datos Bibliográficos

ID2270099
AutoresPaul M Leonardi (0000-0003-0929-8731, University of California, Santa Barbara, autor de correspondencia)
Año2009
Volumen35
Número3
Páginas407-441
Fecha de publicación2009-07-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaHuman Communication Research (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0360-3989 • E-ISSN: 1468-2958
EditorialOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01357.x
OpenAlexW2023442973
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas27
Referencias citadas58

This paper explores the relationship between users' interpretations of a new technology and failure of organizational change. I suggest that people form interpretations of a new technology not only based on their conversations with others, but also through their use of technology's material features directly. Through qualitative and quantitative analysis of ethnographic data on the implementation and use of a computer simulation technology at a major automotive engineering firm, I show that engineers' communication with managers, coworkers, and customers led them to develop an interpretation about what the technology was supposed to do while their interactions with the material features of complementary technologies led them to develop an interpretation that the new simulation technology was not an efficient tool for that specific purpose. I show how the interpretations developed from people's material interactions moderate the effects of the interpretations developed through social interactions on willingness to use the technology in the future. I then demonstrate that, in this particular setting, engineers inadvertently stymied an organizational change of which they were very much in favor by reducing their use of the new technology. I conclude by discussing how misalignments between the information generated in users' interactions with others and with technologies' material features can lead to the failure of planned organizational change

Automotive industry · Business · Emerging technologies · Interpretation (philosophy · Knowledge management · Materiality (auditing · Computer Science · Engineering · Information Systems Theories and Implementation · Open Source Software Innovations · Team Dynamics and Performance · Artificial Intelligence

  • When Does Technology Use Enable Network Change in organizations? A comparative Study of Feature Use and Shared Affordances1

    Paul M Leonardi•MIS Quarterly•2013

  • Critical Realism and Affordances

    Olga Volkoff, Diane M Strong•MIS Quarterly•2013

  • Human Trust in Artificial Intelligence

    Ella Glikson, Anita Williams Woolley•Academy of Management Annals•2020

  • Organizational and Individual Innovation Decisions in an Interorganizational System

    Open Access•Jiawei Sophia Fu, Michelle Shumate et al.•Journal of Communication•2020

  • Failure to Launch

    Open Access•Valérie Bélair-Gagnon, Susan C Lewis et al.•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2020

  • Enacting machine agency when AI makes one’s day

    Open Access•C G Endacott, Nicole Ellison•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2024

  • When Nonprofit Organizations Meet Information and Communication Technologies

    Open Access•Jennifer Ihm, Eun-Mee Kim•Voluntas Revista Internacional de…•2021

  • Reconceptualizing IT-enabled organizational transformation

    Open Access•Faqir Taj, Karlheinz Kautz et al.•Information Technology and People•2026

  • Are There More or Fewer Challenges? Linking Affordances Perspectives to Conflict Experiences in Hybrid Virtual Teams

    Open Access•Yeju Choi, Michael J Lee•Conflict Resolution Quarterly•2025

  • Collaboration technology affordances from virtual collaboration in the time of Covid-19 and post-pandemic strategies

    Open Access•Alanah Mitchell•Information Technology and People•2023

  • Explain it to me like I’m five

    Katherine Gibbard, Harjinder Gill et al.•Behaviour and Information…•2026

  • Understanding the Internal and External Communicative Drivers of Organizational Innovativeness

    Open Access•Jiawei Sophia Fu•Communication Research•2022

  • ‘I can tell you right now, EHR does not improve communication. It does not improve healthcare’

    Ashley K Barrett•Journal of Applied Communication…•2020

  • Social Issue Emergence on the Web

    Open Access•L E Young, Paul M Leonardi•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2012

  • Crossing the Implementation Line

    Open Access•Paul M Leonardi•Communication Theory•2009

  • The Message Design Logics of Organizational Change

    Joshua B Barbour, Cara Jacocks et al.•Communication Monographs•2013

  • Resourcing expertise

    Jeffrey W Treem, William C Barley et al.•Communication Monographs•2020

  • A Case Study of the Failure of Digital Communication to Cross Knowledge Boundaries in Virtual Construction

    Gina Neff, Brittany Fiore-Silfvast et al.•Information Communication & Society•2010

  • Bringing Technological Frames to Work

    Open Access•Jeffrey W Treem, Stephanie L Dailey et al.•Journal of Communication•2015

  • A Taxonomy of Communication Networks

    Michelle Shumate, Andrew Pilny et al.•Annals of the International…•2013

  • Mixing Methods in Organizational Communication Research

    Elizabeth Carlson, Elizabeth J Carlson et al.•Annals of the International…•2016

  • Substance, discourse, and practice

    Joshua B Barbour, John T Jensen et al.•Annals of the International…•2023

  • The social construction of algorithms

    Open Access•Heiner Heiland•New Technology Work and Employment•2025

  • Social media affordances in entry‐level employees’ socialization

    Open Access•Sun Kyong Lee, Michael W Kramer et al.•New Technology Work and Employment•2019

  • Mobile internet is worse than the internet; it can destroy our community”

    R Neriya-Ben Shahar•The Information Society•2020

  • Restorative Justice in a No Excuses Charter School

    Open Access•Hilary Lustick, Vincent Cho et al.•Education and Urban Society•2024

  • From Microactions to Macrostructure and Back

    Open Access•Robert Whitbred, Fabio Fonti et al.•Human Communication Research•2011

  • Materiality and change

    Open Access•Paul M Leonardi, Stephen R Barley•Information and Organization•2008

  • A Social Information Processing Model of Media Use in Organizations

    Open Access•Janet Fulk, Charles Steinfield et al.•Communication Research•1987

  • A Social Influence Model of Technology use

    Janet Fulk, Joseph Schmitz et al.•Organizations and Communication…•1990

  • Social Construction of Communication Technology.

    Janet Fulk•Academy of Management Journal•1993

  • Technological frames

    Open Access•Wanda J Orlikowski, Debra C Gash•ACM Transactions on Information…•1994

  • Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use

    Gerardine Desanctis, Marshall Scott Poole•Organization Science•1994

  • The Discovery of Grounded Theory

    Barney G Glaser, Anselm L Strauss•Discovery of Grounded Theory•2017

  • Computer-Mediated Communication and Organizational Innovation

    Open Access•R E Rice•Journal of Communication•1987

  • The Meaning of “Communication Technology”

    Michele H Jackson•Annals of the International…•1996

  • Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations

    Open Access•Gerardine Desanctis, Peter R Monge et al.•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2006

  • Omega is a Four-Letter Word”

    Guowei Jian•Communication Monographs•2007

  • Communication during intraorganizational innovation adoption

    Laurie K Lewis, David R Seibold•Communication Monographs•1996

  • The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts

    Open Access•Trevor Pinch, Trevor J Pinch et al.•Social Studies of Science•1984

  • Reinvention in the Innovation Process

    Open Access•R E Rice, Everett M Rogers•Knowledge•1980

  • On Line and On Paper

    Beverly H Burris, Kathryn Henderson•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•2001

  • The Interaction Order

    Erving Goffman•American Sociological Review•1983

  • The Constitution of Society

    Charles H Powers, Anthony Giddens•Social Forces•1988

  • Microlevel Structuration in Computer-Supported Group Decision Making

    Open Access•Marshall Scott, Poole Gerardine Desanctis•Human Communication Research•1992

Obras citantes distintas27
Citas por año1,59
Intervalo de citas2009 - 2026 (18)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 27
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae