Reifying Sex Difference Isn't the Answer: Gendering Processes, Risk, and Religiosity

Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) M. Cornwall
ANO 2009
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
ISSN 0021-8294
E-ISSN 1468-5906
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01444.x
CITAÇÕES 16
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 07d66dfe2857e6740770498bff7da832

Resumo

The study of risk and religiosity is fundamentally about gender differences in religiosity. Gender scholars would be highly critical about this debate because it ignores questions about the size and universality of gender effects, there is little or no attempt to conceptualize and measure risk preference, and because it does not take into account gendering processes.

Accounting for Doing Gender

(2009)

The Nature‐Nurture Debate Is Over, and Both Sides Lost! Implications for Understanding Gender Differences in Religiosity

(2009)

Gender, Risk, and Religiousness: Can Power Control Provide the Theory?

(2009)

A Power‐Control Theory of Gender and Religiosity

(2009)

Ferramentas

Acessar via DOI Anna's Archive