Who Complains to Journal Editors and What Happens
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2274158 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rita J Simon (American University), Von Bakanic (American University), Clark Mcphail (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign) |
| Year | 1986 |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 259-271 |
| Publication date | 1986-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sociological Inquiry (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0038-0245 • E-ISSN: 1475-682X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1475-682x.1986.tb00087.x |
| OpenAlex | W2017904198 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 15 |
| References cited | 11 |
Authors' professional status, subfields within sociology, types of analysis, and sources of data were compared between two categories of manuscripts submitted to three editors of the American Sociological Review: those manuscripts about which authors complained and those randomly selected. Thirteen percent of the authors who complained succeeded in having the decision reversed and their manuscripts accepted for publication
Epistemology · Social science · Sociology · Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership · Philosophy
The Manuscript Review and Decision-Making Process
The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements
Factors affecting the independence and reliability of Science and how these are perceived
The Influence of Disciplinary Origins on Peer Review Normativities in a New Discipline
Do Peer Reviews Predict Impact? Evidence from the American Sociological Review , 1978 to 1982
Commentary
Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 1
Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 2
The allocation of prestigious positions in organizational science
Peer Review Verfahren auf dem Prüfstand / Peer Review Research – Reviewed
Mixed Messages
Frame Search and Re-search
If at first you don’t succeed
Structural constraints and the publications dilemma
Representing the Discipline
Science, Faith and Society
The Paradigm Concept and Sociology
Peer Review at the NSF
Patterns of evaluation in science
The Reward System in British Science
Professional Age and the Reception of Sociological Publications
Sex Differences in Status Attainment in Science
Productivity and Academic Position in the Scientific Career
Productivity Differences Among Scientists
Scientists at Major and Minor Universities
Scientific Productivity and the Reward Structure of Science
| Unique citing works | 15 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,38 |
| Citation span | 1987 - 2023 (37) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 14 |