Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Enhancing Participation in Web Tracking Studies Through Monetary Incentives

Experimental Evidence from an Academic Data Collection Infrastructure

Bibliographic Data

ID22763569
AuthorsJudith Gilsbach (0009-0006-5717-0758, Doctoral Candidate, Computational Social Science Department, GESIS—Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Cologne, Germany; and Doctoral Candidate, Graduate School of the Social and Behavioural Sciences (GSBS), University of Konstanz , Konstanz,), Joachim G Piepenburg (0000-0003-3354-447X, Postdoctoral Researcher, Survey Design and Methodology Department, GESIS—Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany; and Postdoctoral Researcher, DIE Leibniz Center for Lifelong Learning, Research Sector Teaching and Learning , Bonn,), Frank Mangold (0000-0002-9776-3113, GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences), Sebastian Stier (0000-0002-1217-5778, Department Head, Computational Social Science Department, GESIS—Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Cologne, Germany; and Professor, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim , Mannheim,), Bernd Weiß (0000-0002-1176-8408, Team Lead, Survey Design and Methodology Department, GESIS—Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany; and Professor, Institute of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Duisburg-Essen , Duisburg and Essen,)
Year2026
Publication date2026-06-23
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Opinion Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-362X • E-ISSN: 1537-5331
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/poq/nfag032
OpenAlexW7165691876
LanguageEN
References cited55

Web tracking studies provide unique insights into digital behavior but face challenges related to participant recruitment and attrition. This study examines how different monetary incentive structures—unconditional and conditional—and incentive amounts affect key recruitment stages: consent to participate in web tracking, installation of tracking software, and attrition after installation. To assess the effectiveness of monetary incentives across probabilistic and nonprobabilistic recruitment methods, we implement a preregistered experiment with 1,862 participants in the GESIS Panel.dbd—an academic infrastructure for collecting and linking digital behavioral data with survey data in Germany. Results show that unconditional incentives increase consent rates, whereas conditional incentives more effectively foster installation and, in particular, sustain participation after installation. While probabilistic recruitment poses challenges for initial consent, participation levels hereafter remain comparable across recruitment methods. These findings contribute to the development of cost-effective incentive strategies aimed at enhancing participation in web tracking studies.

Affect (linguistics) · Attrition · Data collection · Incentive · Probabilistic logic · Survey data collection · Tracking (education) · Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse

  • The Graphical Presentation of a Collection of Means

    Harvey Goldstein, M J R Healy•Journal of the Royal Statistical…•1995

  • A Review of Conceptual Approaches and Empirical Evidence on Probability and Nonprobability Sample Survey Research

    Open Access•Carina Cornesse, Annelies G Blom et al.•Journal of Survey Statistics and…•2020

  • How social network sites and other online intermediaries increase exposure to news

    Open Access•Michael Scharkow, Frank Mangold et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2020

  • Overlapping confidence intervals or standard error intervals

    Open Access•Mark E Payton, Matthew H Greenstone et al.•Journal of Insect Science•2003

  • Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions.

    J Siegrist•Journal of Occupational Health…•1996

  • Social Exchange Theory

    Open Access•Russell Cropanzano, Michael S Mitchell et al.•Journal of Management•2005

  • Null effects of news exposure

    Open Access•Magdalena Wojcieszak, Bernhard Clemm Von Hohenberg et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2022

  • Determinants of willingness to donate data from social media platforms

    Z Kmetty, Ádám Stefkovics et al.•Information Communication & Society•2025

  • Exchange and Power in Social Life

    Peter M Blau•Exchange And Power In Social Life•2017

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of discrepancies between logged and self-reported digital media use

    Open Access•Douglas A Parry, Brittany I Davidson et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2021

  • Automated Tracking Approaches for Studying Online Media Use

    Clara Christner, Aleksandra Urman et al.•Communication Methods and Measures•2022

  • Digital Technologies and Selective Exposure

    Open Access•Ana Sofía Cardenal Izquierdo, Carlos Aguilar Paredes et al.•The International Journal of…•2019

  • Uncovering Digital Trace Data Biases

    Open Access•Oriol J Bosch, Patrick Sturgis et al.•Communication Methods and Measures•2024

  • Beyond time delays

    Open Access•Roberto Ulloa, Frank Mangold et al.•Communication Methods and Measures•2025

  • Correcting Sample Selection Bias of Historical Digital Trace Data

    Chankyung Pak, Kelley Cotter et al.•Communication Methods and Measures•2022

  • Consent to data linkage for different data domains – the role of question order, question wording, and incentives

    Christoph Beuthner, Bernd Weiß et al.•International Journal of Social…•2023

  • Facebook as an Avenue to News

    Open Access•Felix Schmidt, Frank Mangold et al.•Political Communication•2024

  • Do (Not!) Track Me

    Open Access•Teresa Gil-Lopez, Clara Christner et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2023

  • Explaining Online News Engagement Based on Browsing Behavior

    Open Access•Judith Möller, Robbert Nicolai van de Velde et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2019

  • Two Half-Truths Make a Whole? On Bias in Self-Reports and Tracking Data

    Open Access•Pascal Jürgens, Birgit Stark et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2019

  • Establishing an Open Probability-Based Mixed-Mode Panel of the General Population in Germany

    Open Access•Michael Bosnjak, Tanja Dannwolf et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2017

  • Enhancing Participation in Probability-Based Online Panels

    Open Access•Nils Witte, Ines Schaurer et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2022

  • How Do Internet-Related Characteristics Affect Whether Members of a German Mixed-Mode Panel Switch from the Mail to the Web Mode

    Open Access•David Bretschi, Bernd Weiß•Social Science Computer Review•2022

  • Integrating Survey Data and Digital Trace Data

    Open Access•Sebastian Stier, Johannes Breuer et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2019

  • Improving the Quality of Individual-Level Web Tracking

    Open Access•Silke Adam, Mykola Makhortykh et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2024

  • Learning about the unknown Spitzenkandidaten

    Open Access•Simon Richter, Sebastian Stier•European Union Politics•2022

  • Are Incentive Effects on Response Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Large-scale, Face-to-face Surveys Generalizable to Germany? Evidence from Ten Experiments

    Klaus Pforr, Michael Blohm et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2015

  • Partisan Enclaves and Information Bazaars

    Matthew Tyler, Justin Grimmer et al.•The Journal of Politics•2022

  • Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption

    Seymour Flaxman, Seth Flaxman et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2016

  • Willingness to Participate in Passive Mobile Data Collection

    Open Access•Florian Keusch, Bella Struminskaya et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2019

  • Recruiting a Probability Sample for an Online Panel

    Annette Scherpenzeel, Vera Toepoel•Public Opinion Quarterly•2012

  • The Immensely Inflated News Audience

    Markus Prior•Public Opinion Quarterly•2009

  • Understanding Willingness to Share Smartphone-Sensor Data

    Open Access•Bella Struminskaya, Vera Toepoel et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2021

  • Do Online Voter Guides Empower Citizens

    Open Access•Simon Munzert, Pablo Barberá Aresté et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2021

  • (Almost) Everything in Moderation

    Open Access•Allison M Gue, Andrew M Gue et al.•American Journal of Political…•2021

  • The Use and Effects of Incentives in Surveys

    Open Access•Eleanor Singer, Cong Ye•The Annals of the American…•2013

  • Post Post-Broadcast Democracy? News Exposure in the Age of Online Intermediaries

    Open Access•Sebastian Stier, Frank Mangold et al.•American Political Science Review•2022

  • Tracking and promoting the usage of a Covid-19 contact tracing app

    Open Access•Simon Munzert, Peter Selb et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2021

  • Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election

    Open Access•Allison M Gue, Brendan Nyhan et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2020

  • To what extent are members of an online panel willing to share different data types? A conjoint experiment

    Open Access•Claudia Ochoa, Melanie Revilla•Methodological Innovations•2018

  • Anomalies

    Open Access•G Loewenstein, Richard H Thaler•The Journal of Economic…•1989

  • Willingness to Participate in a Metered Online Panel

    Open Access•Melanie Revilla, Mick P Couper et al.•CAM•2021

  • Social Behavior as Exchange

    George C Homans•American Journal of Sociology•1958

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae