Multidimensional Problems

This article examines Jeffrey Alexander's effort to overcome the impasse of sociology's entrenchment into opposing utilitarian and normativistic camps. The utilitarian and normativistic perspectives are described, and some of the requirements for a successful synthesis are stated. It is shown that Alexander does not actually attempt such a synthesis himself, but is content to present Weber's and Parsons's efforts in this direction. It is argued that his major contribution is to be found not in the promotion of a “multidimensional” synthetic approach, but in the formulation of an epistemological/methodological rationale for the alleged superiority of a multidimensional sociology over one-dimensional versions. An account is given of the claims of this “postpositivist” methodology, and its de facto treatment of the relationship between theory and data is criticized. Since issues of empirical adequacy are not sufficiently addressed, it is concluded that Alexander's advocacy of multidimensionality is less than convincing

De facto · Epistemology · Political science · Promotion (chess · Sociology · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Law · Philosophy · Social and Cultural Dynamics · Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory

• Der Neofunktionalismus Nachruf auf ein Forschungsprogramm

  Michael Schmid•2003

  Incluir item

• The antinomies of neofunctionalism

  Hans Joas•Inquiry•1988

  Incluir item

• Power and theory

  Open Access•Jeffrey Broadbent•Journal of Political Power•2024

  Incluir item

• Formal and substantive multidimensionality in Jeffrey Alexander's work

  Open Access•Jayme Gomes Neto•Thesis Eleven•2025

  Incluir item

• Structure of Social Action

  Talcott Parsons•Structure of Social Action•1967

  Incluir item

• Theoretical Logic in Sociology

  Jeffrey C Alexander, Jeffrey Alexander•Theoretical Logic in Sociology•2021

  Incluir item

• Theoretical Logic in Sociology-Volume 1

  D Willer, Jeffrey C Alexander•Social Forces•1984

  Incluir item