Rethinking the Postmodern Perspective
Excavating the Kantian System to Rebuild Social Theory
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2276969 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael Roberts (0000-0002-0929-3044, The Graduate Center, CUNY, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 681-698 |
| Publication date | 2000-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sociological Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0038-0253 • E-ISSN: 1533-8525 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2000.tb00079.x |
| OpenAlex | W2007492559 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 28 |
The postmodernism debate in the social sciences has been misunderstood as primarily an epistemological problem concerning method. The evolution of the postmodernism debate into the science wars has raised the same issues Critics blame postmodernism and science studies for epistemological relativism and hostility toward science, while supporters attempt to use postmodernism as a part of a project to replace positivism with interpretive methods. Both critics and supporters of postmodernism miss the most important aspect of the postmodern perspective: the attempt to break out of epistemology and the Kantian conceptual framework. Critics of postmodernism and science studies also mistakenly argue that postmodernism is the sole creation of the humanities. Many of the key concepts of the postmodern perspective, however, were developed through reflections on novel developments in the natural sciences. Because critics and supporters of postmodernism in the social sciences remain within a Kantian conceptual framework, the postmodern break from epistemology has been overlooked. A close reading of reflexive texts on the natural sciences rules out any claim that the post-modern perspective is simply a relativistic methodology that dislikes science. The pages below focus on key texts by Gaston Bachelard, Georges Canguilhem, Michel Foucault and Bruno Latour as an attempt to re-orient the postmodernism debate in the social sciences. A reexamination of these texts reveals how the postmodernism debate in the social sciences has mistakenly understood postmodernism as a problem of method and epistemology. Science studies represents the maturation of the postmodern perspective by building a non-epistemologically oriented social theory. The possibility of rebuilding social theory after the dismantling of epistemology is the unique halimark of science studies, the most recent development of the postmodern perspective
Epistemology · Philosophy of science · Postmodern music · Postmodern theatre · Postmodernism · Relativism · Social science · Sociology · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
The normal and the pathological
The emergence of probability
Selected philosophical writings.
Handbook of qualitative research
A Spinoza Reader
Knowledge and social imagery
Descartes
The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language
Interpretive Social Science
Postmodernism is Not What You Think
Difference Troubles
Postmodernism and the Social Sciences
Ideology and Utopia
The Order of Things
A Theory of Writing and Experimental Writing in the Age of Telecommunications
The Sociological Imagination
The Politics of Identity
A Study of History
The sociological imagination
Landmarks of Tomorrow
Interpretive Social Science
Simians, Cyborgs, and Women
Dialectic of Enlightenment
Institutional Perspectives on Sociology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |