Anatomy of an Article: The Peer‐Review Process as Method
Dados Bibliográficos
AUTOR(ES) | |
---|---|
ANO | 2012 |
TIPO | Artigo |
PERIÓDICO | American Anthropologist |
ISSN | 0002-7294 |
E-ISSN | 0002-7294 |
EDITORA | Wiley (United States) |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1548-1433.2012.01490.x |
CITAÇÕES | 4 |
ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-18 |
MD5 |
b87fd7113a906e754b9ca768f07dd1d3
|
Resumo
In this article, we provide an unprecedented insider view of the peer‐review process. Specifically, we highlight how an author (Vora) revised a manuscript submitted to American Anthropologist in a manner that resulted in its eventual publication in the journal. This included responding in various revisions of the manuscript to comments from the editor (Boellstorff), as well as a reviewer who has agreed to reveal her identity (Karen Ho). By showing examples of this revision process, we explore the 'anatomy of an article,' illustrating how a deeper understanding of the peer‐review process can contribute to anthropological professionalization and successful publishing.