Historia, tradiciones editoriales y sociedad. Las Memorias y el Compendio de José Antonio de Plaza (Nueva Granada, 1850)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22867211 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Patricia Cardona (Universidad EAFIT, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Issue | 57 |
| Pages | 97-116 |
| Publication date | 2015-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Historia Crítica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0121-1617 • E-ISSN: 1900-6152 |
| Publisher | Universidad de los Andes (PUBLISHER • VE) |
| DOI | 10.7440/histcrit57.2015.06 |
| OpenAlex | W2266506696 |
| Language | ES |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 9 |
History, in the modern sense of the word, is discourse materialized in books; diverse elements of a social, political, cultural, and economic nature have participated in the process of its configuration. This article aims to restore the historicity of History on the basis of two different types of books: the extensive ones, addressed to those with greatest reading skills, and those of a more accessible, informative nature that are directed to the majorities. In order to do so, it has turned to two books published by José Antonio de Plaza in 1850, the purpose of which was to disseminate information about the past and constitute it as a reference point of political formation of the inhabitants of the fledgling nation.
Art · Historicity (philosophy) · Humanities · Order (exchange) · Political science · Politics · Reading (process) · Sociology · Historical Studies in Latin America · History · History and Politics in Latin America · Latin American history and culture · Law
Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes
Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities
Inscribir y borrar
Una aproximación a la historia de la lectura en la Nueva Granada
III. The Ideological Context of Hobbes's Political Thought
Forms and Meanings
La enseñanza de la historia en Colombia
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.1 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2016 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |