Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) D. Carr , Vicki A. Freedman , Jennifer C. Cornman
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Boston University, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Jennifer C. Cornman Consulting
ANO 2019
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Journal of Marriage and Family
ISSN 0022-2445
E-ISSN 1741-3737
EDITORA Sage Publications (United States)
DOI 10.1111/jomf.12557
CITAÇÕES 7
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 10e3298e4324d033f07a53a6ad10aa23

Resumo

ObjectiveWe evaluate whether non‐spousal family support and strain moderate the effect of disability on older adults' daily frustration and happiness, and whether these patterns differ by gender and marital status.BackgroundStress buffering perspectives predict that harmful effects of stress on well‐being are buffered by family support, whereas stress proliferation models suggest effects are intensified by family strain. The extent to which family relationships moderate these associations may vary on the basis of gender and marital status, as non‐spousal family ties are considered especially salient for women and unpartnered persons.MethodData are from the 2013 Disability and Use of Time supplement to the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (n = 1,474), a national sample of adults ages 60+. Multivariate regression models are estimated for married/partnered men and women, and formerly married women.ResultsNeither family support nor strain moderated the effect of severe impairment on married men's emotions. Family support buffered the effect of impairment on frustration among divorced and widowed women, but not their married counterparts. Counterintuitively, family arguments reduced frustration and increased happiness among married women with severe impairment.ConclusionConsistent with stress buffering perspectives, family support was most protective for the vulnerable population of formerly married older women with severe impairment.ImplicationsThis study underscores the importance of family support for formerly married women managing health‐related challenges in later life.

Ferramentas